"the city's police commissioner said the two suspects had such a large
cache of weapons that they were probably planning other attacks.""Probably" isn't catchy enough. News must be sensational. Make
that headline definite. Scratch "probably" and say "suspects
planned more attacks".
Could the boxer bomber be tied to attacks in. Utah?
You would not want to jump to conclusioms. Maybe they just wanted that bomber
motiff for their apartment.
So sad that so many thousands had to hunker down in their homes in fear of the
bombers on the loose. Makes one wonder how many of them had a gun in the house
to protect the lives of their families.
Peacemaker,Your statement makes one wonder what you are saying.Did
you prefer a Florida scenario, as in the Treyvon Martin case?Did you want
to see those who owned guns out as a group, acting as vigilante police?Boston Police told the residents of the city to stay in their homes for a
How many of the weapons were acquired under Massachusetts strict gun laws?
Background checks for immigration, background checks for naturalization as a
citizen... Hey, Barack, how are those background checks going for you anyway?
justamacguy: The brothers have been here for at least 10 years, and came here
legally - under Bush's era, I remind you - so maybe your question should go
to Bush and his administration's procedure of background checks!
just wating for LDS? lib's apology since we now know these terrorists are
Be careful. Xscribe doesn't like it when we step on Barack's toes.
"Boston Police told the residents of the city to stay in their homes for a
reason."SG:Yeah, more silly top-heavy police work
there. Apparently the reason must have been so the terrorist could hide away
from where the brass thought he was so nobody could find him. It was only when
the marshall-law order to stay inside was lifted that the homeowner went outside
and found him.Now we have the enemy-combatant issue heating up
enough to further embarrass the police and the administration. Their desire to
avoid that at all costs makes it understandable that they would speculate about
"probable" further attacks (wait, wouldn't that be
"terrorism"?) than to own up to bad decisions.
@lost Why would LDS lib need to apologize? if you combine all 12 terrorist
that have attacked the US (counting the two from Boston) that claim to be or may
have been Muslim they make up .0004 percent of the Muslim population rendering
your focus on Muslims seems a little displaced.