how do we know that these two guys don't just have a coke and sandwich in
their back packs?
Perhaps there are subsequent photos of them without their backpacks. If so,
that would indicate that they may in fact be the bombers. I guess time will
How do we know that they are not being used to distract from others responsible
for this crime?I shared this link info on another DN comment but it
has not gone through yet. I'll try again. Google ( Did
“Anonymous” find the Boston Bombers? Photo’s Included ) click
on the "original photo's" link On that site are photos and comments
showing some others people that should be considered "Persons of
interest", identifying features of their backpack resemble markings on the
backpacks used in the explosions.
Aside from the possibility they will be patsies, if these are the guys, you can
figure they have no fear of being caught. Walking by cameras with a white ball
cap turned backward on a busy street that any average person would know is being
filmed, shows you they are not very interested in hiding.
They're supspects. If they only had a coke and sandwich in their backpack
just come on in and tell your story. Your innocent until proven guilty. I worry
more about all the knucklehead vigilantes we have out there that shoot first and
ask questions later. The fact the FBI released this reveals they need the
public's help not their hysteria.
For once I agree with you HS Fan. We don't need any Jack Ruby types to add
to the coming conspiracy theories that this story will undoubtedly provoke.
Glad to see all on this board remain civilized and are not jumping to
conclusions about race and guilt. I remind myself of the Richard Jewell
situation where a man who saved lives was subsequently blamed only because he
fit the "profile" of what they were looking (not to mention the West
Memphis Three). That said, the FBI is doing good work and I have to assume they
are fairly confident in these two being involved through the surveillance video.
Dropping a bag near the site, bomb going off shortly thereafter. All they need
for smoking gun is pics with these guys walking around afterward without the
bags.A question for the chefs out there. Are those backpacks big
enough to hold the pressure cookers mentioned? Also, how heavy would a pressure
cooker be filled with all that stuff. The guy in the white cap seems to be
fairly easily carrying his pack without a lot of effort. But I don't have
the slightest idea how big or heavy that type of bomb would be.
Patriot: You wouldn't be saying that if Bush/McCain/Romney were president.
"how do we know that these two guys don't just have a coke and sandwich
in their back packs?"If it isn't them, then they should
come forward and explain so the investigation can move on. They have already
seen their pictures all over the news and they have yet to come forward....
One of the injured victims saw one of those two place the bag on the ground just
minutes before it exploded. The FBI posted those photos after getting one of the
best witnesses confirming them as suspects.
The FBI has no evidence that those Men are guilty, therefore, the Policemen are
guilty of Battery. We may not agree, but it is the law. Consider the
following:“Res Judicata”:"An illegal
arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of
hisliberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he
would in repelling anyother assault and battery." (State v. Robinson,
145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260)."Each person has the right to resist an
unlawful arrest. In such a case, the personattempting the arrest stands in
the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the useof force, as in
self- defense." (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).Even if the suspect did commit the crime, where was the warrant for his
arrest? We should demand that our law enforcement officers act within the
confines of the law, or else, no rights will be secure.
Mugabe,Turn on the news.
"The FBI has no evidence that those Men are guilty, therefore, the Policemen
are guilty of Battery."You're kidding, right Mugabee? First
of all, what do you know about what evidence the FBI has or doesn't have?
Second of all they have every right in the world to seek these people out for
questioning even if arrest warrants have not been issued. And the cops very much
can detain them based on their actions. But the actions of the two
suspects made all this moot. When you kill a cop, hijack a vehicle and kidnap
somebody, and then shoot at and throw bombs at cops, well, yes, they can arrest
you. Even without a warrant. You don't really think cops get arrest
warrants every time they put someone in custody do you?