Published: Wednesday, April 17 2013 12:00 a.m. MDT
Re: ". . . all politicians are occasionally guilty of hypocrisy, but have we
ever seen anything this blatant?"Yes, we have.When
Obama raided the Social Security programs -- welfare programs that sorta work
and are, at least partially, self-funded -- in order to promote and force the
move to his legacy program, Obamacare.Which is not self-funded, and
is widely known to be completely unworkable.Even more hypocritical
than that, however, is how Obama and Democrats, aided by their captive media
sycophants, attempt to sell themselves as champion of the "little guy,"
when they've done more to hurt real people than any administration in US
It's not surprising at all. As soon as Obama cut some waste from medicare
they ALL said it was an attack on Medicare and seniors. It's nothing less
Great letter Roland, but when you ask the question, "... but have we ever
seen anything this blatant?" my answer is, well, yeh...almost everyday.Just a couple of examples from close to (your) home:Mitt
Romney's campiagn to end "Obamacare" when the basis of that
healthcare bill came from the program promoted by Governor Romney and passed by
the Massachesets Legilature.Larry Craig's hardline stance
against gay and lesbian rights even though he was caught soliciting from an
undercover officer in the Minneapolis Airport.Yes, there is
hypocrisy on both sides of the aisle but is this the most blatant examople of
Republican hypocrisy? You might gat an argument on that one.
These guys have an automatic pay increase every year. I'm sure they feel
entitled to it. They feel entitled to take every ones ssi if they want. They
have a way to take any ones 401 if they want. Who is the entitled.
"I know that all politicians are occasionally guilty of hypocrisy, but have
we ever seen anything this blatant?"Not since 2008 when Obama
called Bush "unpatriotic" for running up the national debt, and after
being elected, outdoing Bush's debt spending by a long shot.
Great letter Roland and to answer your question, NO we haven't seen this
kind of hypocrisy ever. It's further proof that the GOP. Is completely out
of touch and not capable of leading as presently constructed. They don't
care about the debt. They don't care about the economy. They don't
care about America. They care about one thing, power. They covet the
power and position which president Obama currently holds.Even if it
means attacking their own positions! This is further proof that
Obama could cure cancer and repubs would attack him for it.My oh my
how desiring power can go to the head. It reminds me of amalickiah from the
scriptures. He could care less what happened to his nation and people, as long
as he had power. We all know what happened to him. If the GOP doesn't
change they too shall face a similar fate. They already are. They haven't
won the popular vote in a presidential election in quite some time!
I have to agree with most posters above. Hypocrisy? Yes. Surprisingly so?
Not at all.It is my belief that if you were to offer the most hard
line conservatives and strident liberals in Congress the following deal, about
half would take it. "You can keep your seat and remain in power for the
rest of your life if you will flip your political views to the opposite
side."On both sides, there are folks who truly believe what they
say. But on both sides there are folks who would say anything if it kept
getting them elected.
You expect repubs not to be hypocrites? That just isn't going to happen.
Remember when they cheered Bush for setting a date to withdraw from Iraq but
when Obama went ahead and withdrew from Iraq, they all bashed him for it?
It's like that with repubs, they will never accept anything Obama does as a
positive. Obama could give them all a million dollars tax free and they
would criticize him for it.
What did the Democrats say about the Ryan plan that cut some of the GROWTH in
some entitlement spending? We saw adds on TV of Republicans supposedly pushing
old grandma off a cliff and accused Republicans of staving women and children.
And now Obama says he wants to cut S.S and now we see "acceptance" from
the left but no cries about pushing old people of cliffs or staving women and
children! Who are the REAL hypocrites?
"Who are the REAL hypocrites?"The people who have been
crying for cuts in entitlements but are now crying foul when those cuts are
proposed by the president they have vilified for four years. Those are the real
hypocrits.The other side (the Democrats) has resisted cuts but are
now trying to come to a reasonable middle ground and accepting that some cuts
will be required in order to balance the budget. The unhypocritical thing for
the Republicans to do now would be to accept some tax increases that they have
resisted for so long. (And I'm not talking about just letting Bush tax cuts
expire) That would show that the Republicans are trying to come to some middle
ground, now that they are getting what they want, or at least what they said
Oh my goodness people.Are you trying to play one-upmanship?Which side is worse? Does it really matter?It is clear by these posts
that both sides are hypocrites. Both sides will use virtually
ANYTHING and EVERYTHING done or proposed by the other side as a club.And we fall for it hook, line and sinker.Unfortunately, we
don't want any and all good ideas or good solutions. We only want solution
proposed by OUR party, and will staunchly REJECT all ideas by the other one.
How can we possibly improve things that way?We better
wake up and put America over party. And we better do it soon.
Silly letter that conveniently leaves out critical factsThe token
cuts in social security were only proposed in response to massive tax increases
and continued irresponsible spending They are not a serious attempt
at reform, but merely a manipulative attempt to divert attention to the general
failure of the larger Obama budgetThe cost is not remotely worth the
benefitThe major hypocrisy here, is the left crying foul over
Republican refusal to take the bait of token changes to entitlement, in a budget
proposal that accelerates economic suicide, in a blatantly manipulative
passive/aggressive attempt to divert attention from their continued economic
So what will you do about it?Will you demand that political
candidates explain and defend their positions, and hold them accountable through
your votes and your campaign contributions, or will you just dutifully march
into the voting booth and robotically vote straight-party like you always do?We have the government we deserve, and that's nothing to be proud
of.You can grouse about it, or you can start engaging people in
serious, thoughtful conversation for the purpose of improving the quality of
political candidates.Above all, you have to demand serious campaign
finance reform. Your voice won't matter as long as money is regarded as
"Above all, you have to demand serious campaign finance reform. Your voice
won't matter as long as money is regarded as "speech." "BINGO BlueUntil you get all corporate and union money and
lobbying perks out of the system, nothing much else matters.Unfortunately, we are going in the wrong direction, as this last presidential
election was the most expensive in history.If the money was out,
most of our other problems would fix themselves.
Good letter, Roland. Yes, the hypocrisy of this particular statement could
almost be seen as a Republican attempt to outdo themselves, which is hard to
accomplish.But I would take exception to your assumption that Social
Security is an entitlement. Even the Republicans should argue that point. They
won't, but they should.
S.S in not an entitlement because if you work, the government takes your money
(FICA) and your employer matches that with the "promise" that you will
receive YOUR money when you retire. Well, now its the government's money
and the government already spent it all and all is left is an IOU in the
"trust" fund! How did that happen? LBJ stole it and spent it all on his
failed, "great society" program! It really doesn't matter that he
was a Democrat, the grand larceny still happened! Congratulations America, you
have been duped by your government, again. It was never the government's
money but that didn't matter did it?
I Have Paid Into Social Security All My Life And Expect It To Be There When I
Retire. I don't Accept As An Excuse That We can't Afford It Because Of
The War In Iraq Or Mismanagement Of The War In Afganistan.The
Solution To Dealing With Stupid Wars Is To Deploy The Fact Checkers Before We
Deploy The Troups, And Not Enter Into War We Are Not Willing To Do What It Takes
To Win And Then Get Out. If This Means I Have An Entitlemen
Mentality, Please Forgive Me.
"and the government already spent it all and all is left is an IOU in the
"trust" fund! How did that happen? LBJ stole it and spent it all"Mountanman. Care to list all the president and congress that dipped
into SS trust fun.It is certainly a much longer list than just LBJ.
Yes, we have been duped by the Govt, but some of that Govt had a
big red R by their name.I think that you know that. Why not be
Ok, Roland, Where was your indignation when the dems did the same thing
with Ryan’s budget?Maverick,You obviously close your
eyes to every dem actionJoeBlow, LBJ set the precedent,
unfortunately followed by all his successors – BO being the worst
To Mountanman: The word "entitlement" might not mean what you think it
means, but social security and medicare are most certainly entitlement
programs.To lost in D.C.: The Ryan budget is a farce. It is not even
a budget, it contains no budgets for any government departments. It actually
increases the deficit for the first decade, even if you believe its magic
asterisk assumptions, which virtually no economists do.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.— About comments