Comments about ‘First lady wades into debate over gun violence’

Return to article »

Published: Wednesday, April 10 2013 12:00 a.m. MDT

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Atlanta, GA

It's a shame that there are serious problems with the jobs, the economy, massive numbers of people on food stamps,etc. Yet the focus of this woman and her husband is on trivial changes in gun law that will in no way prevent a single child from being murdered. All the while, they ignore any real reforms that could assist in getting help for mentally disturbed individuals or actively protecting children in schools...

lost in DC
West Jordan, UT

You need to understand. With these people, it isn't about doing what's right for the country, but consolidating ever more control.

Salt Lake City, UT

Nice bangs Michelle. For those of us who have ALWAYS been proud of our country don't really care what a person who only became proud at the election of her husband has to say about almost anything in this country.

3 more years and you'll be a footnote in history.

Mcallen, TX

Hypocrite! There are guns present to protect her, Barack, and their children.

A Guy With A Brain
Enid, OK

I cannot stand Michelle "For The First Time In My Life I'm Finally Proud To Be An American" Obama.

And, yes, I do actually feel better for saying that.....

Having said that, I would love, LOVE, L-O-V-E to see Michelle Obama's face if she were told that ALL of the Secret Service agents protecting her and husband were not allowed to carry guns anymore.

The hypocrisy on the left makes me pray for the Lord to return. Quickly.

Mcallen, TX

Second amendment takes away all debating.

First lady should wade into debate over taking money from tax payers for vacations to Spain, Vail Colorado, Martha's Vineyard, India, Hawaii, etc.

Hundreds of millions in benefits can be considered excessive.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments