Oh my! Cutting S.S? Will the left say their man Obama is pushing old ladies off
the cliff and starving women and children? Be careful liberals, your hypocrisy
is showing, again!
So funny that all the liberals love this guy so much!We are for sure
heading for tougher times. America is going to pay a heavy price for allowing
this fox into the henhouse.
While insisting on more taxes! Obama is like a stuck record. Why would we expect
anything different. This is more smoke and mirrors. Obama knows that more taxes
will not fly so it is easy to present something that sounds like he is trying.
Manipulation is his game. How will this work in any other aspect of real life. I
will cut my overhead but only if I recieve more money. Another big Ha Ha
This is the budget that by law, Obama was required to submit on February 1st, so
we can see that he is (a) disobeying the law, and since this is all based on an
anonymous official, not the actual written budget, Obama is (b) refusing to even
admit what is in his bill.We must cut spending drastically. The
tiny steps thrown out as a trail balloon may be painful, but like all his
sequester cuts, are designed for maximum impact on popular programs while
leaving the most wasteful, duplicate and ineffective programs untouched.Cutting payments to doctors and for pharmaceuticals does nothing to
improve healthcare, but will create shortages and worse outcomes for patients.
Obamacare must be repealed entirely if we are to even maintain our current
levels of care. But, his goal is to destroy the best system in the world and
replace it with socialized medicine. The ultimate insult is to
propose a massive new pre-school program (even if funded by the dwindling number
of smokers) when existing childhood programs are nearly all worthless, except as
free babysitting for unwed mothers, or as indoctrination programs for likely
Democrat voters.Obama cannot be trusted, period!
Won't spending more money fix the economy? Why is barack changing his
What Obama REALLY wants; communism!
Lets see.Cutting entitlements which are growing out of control and
raising taxes from historically low levels as a fix to our problem.That is what most would call a balanced approach. And non-partisans would
call it reasonable.You guys would complain about Obama regardless of
what he does. = No credibility.That is why I dont watch people like
Hannity or Sharpton. They are too predictable.
How about cuts to mid-east countries? Sequester them, not us!Isn't sequester a hiding place for Obama failures? You know,-blame
sequester, and not the commander.
If the budget has significant cuts (like those detailed in the Simpson
commission) then I would want the compromise and will the Republicans that I
voted for exactly that. If the budget has token cuts only to appear significant
on the "headline" level to simply put pressure and win votes in upcoming
elections, then it's business as usual in D.C.
Who is dumber? The people we elected in DC or we the people who elected them?
My memory may not be correct, but it seems that for two years SS recipients
received no cost of living increase - yet congress voted once or twice to give
themselves pay raises?
Yeah, communisim is the grand plan, and North Korea is in on it. Question is:
Are we going to take over North Korea, or is North Korea going to take us over?
And who will be the leader one that happens? Or maybe Obama and Un will be
Props to BO for daring to mess with SS, but $130B in reductions and $580B in
increased taxes is not balanced.I wonder if he can get reid and
schumer to go along, though.Too bad he is still insisting on even
more higher taxes, since the repubs ALREADY GAVE him higher taxes.But this is probably all grandstanding on his part, because he knows his party
will not go along with it.
@Mountanman FYI, if you haven't figured this out yet, Obama is not a
liberal. His is Reagan 2.0
When talking about the national debt, those in Washington tell us the US does
not default on its debt. Considering that roughly $4 trillion of the debt is
money that was appropriated from the social security fund, this move looks to me
like a default. How can social security be in trouble when it has so much money
owed? When Japan and China get a clue, and stop buying US debt we will be in an
economic world of hurt then. In the words of BTO, "You ain't seen
"Isn't sequester a hiding place for Obama failures?"How
is that? Care to explain?Now, if you had said that the
"sequester was a hiding place for Congress's failure" you would
probably get unanimous support.I still have to chuckle.Obama can not spend a dime without the approval of congress.Obama can
not raise or lower taxes one dime without the approval of congress.Yet, Obama gets blamed for tax rates and spending rates.Hey, I
have not problem with those who disagree and dislike Obama. But at
least use logic when assigning blame.Has anyone seen that the Stock
Market has doubled in the last 3 years?Why is that? Let me guess.
Republican controlled house? Too funny
"Obama is not a liberal. His is Reagan 2.0"wow Thanks for
making me spew milk out my nose
All of the talk about decreases over the next 10 years is a joke. No one seems
to have the guts to do it now. Ten years from now we will probably be at a $30
trillion deficit if not higher....10 years is a joke just like his 5% salary
decrease.Utah Mormon democrats need to wake up and bail out of the
democratic party. However the Republican party stinks also....join the
constitution party and follow the constitution like it says in the D&C.
JoeBlow: Why do things need to be explained to you?Wake up!
Because you know that you cannot explain it.I expected an answer
like that from you.And whats more, every tax change or $$ spent was
voted on by the Republican controlled House.That is a fact. One
that you are either unaware of or choose to ignore.It is much easier
to simply say "its Obama's fault" than to look at the realities.
everything that hurt the rest of us, made more money for the rich. record profit
oil. they get tax money by the way. record profit for food companies. smaller
containers price same or more. mass shootings = record profit for amo and
weapons sale. nra propaganda paid for from said companies. nataural gas record
supplies because of fracking and prices the same and water unfit for drinking.
factories closed jobs lost labour sent to slave wage countires americans out of
work. price of clothing prices same after getting cheaper labour. 2 wars that
gave us record debt the rich richer and the rest poor. the middle clas is
getting smaller. pay roll insurace is being cut by companies at a record level
more people unable to afford insurance. now they pay a higher rate out of pocket
then insured do. elected congress and others socialized medical for life. but
you they want to cut your medicare and ssn that you worked and paid into your
whole life. and they get retirement for life and ssn. yes move forth captalism
for the few. it is not a thing made by a god it is greed.
"...Obama would reduce the federal government deficit by $1.8 trillion over
10 years."-------------HA, Ha, ha, HEE, Hee!!!They've **got** to be kidding.The best these clowns can
come up with is to reduce the **deficit** by a bit more, spread over **ten**
years, than has the deficit for **every one** of the last four years!!That's like saying, "Stop complaining!! I'm applying the brakes
so we'll go over the cliff a few seconds later than if I were not applying
the brakes!"Or, like tossing a life line to someone that is only
a **few** feet shorter than the distance needed.But, as I've
said so many times before, it is we, the electorate (generally speaking, as I
realize that I and many others certainly wouldn't and didn't pick most
of them), who picked these people. And, it is only we who are to blame for the
I have a friend who sported a bumper sticker last fall that read: "Save
Medicare - Vote Democratic"I can't wait to talk to him about his
Tea partiers are hilarious. The stock market goes down and it's
Obama's fault. It goes up, crickets. Obama agrees to spending cuts in
2011, but tea partiers swear that he has cut absolutely nothing. Obama says
let's do something about entitlements, he's a Socialist. (That makes
absolutely no sense. You realize that don't you?) It's just a pure,
unadulterated hatred for the man that bears no correlation to common sense. No
matter what Obama does, it proves to any tea partier that he's the
Anti-Christ. Tea partiers -- so predictable and so absurd.
You realize that don't you?) It's just a pure, unadulterated tingling
for the man that bears no correlation to common sense. No matter what Obama
does, it proves to any Obamette that he's the Christ. Obamettes -- so
predictable and so absurd.
A budget proposal that the Tea Party wacko's hate and one that liberals and
the AFL-CIO dislike as well. Must be about right?
What Obama wants is compromise. He does not want to cut entitlement programs,
but is willing to in order to find middle ground to move us forward. Seems like
darned if you do and darned if you don't is the theme from too many
comments. Close loopholes? Republican leadership in the House was all for this
just two months ago. Let's support getting government out of gridlock and
take Obama up on his proposals, for everyone's sake, regardless of party!
JoeBlow,If what you say about assigning blame is true, then why do
Democrats blame the poor economy on Bush? They still blame him to this day.
Ok Joe Blow, here goes. One. If I had lots of cash, I'd find some place
to put it other than a bank because if the American dollar does crash, the money
will be worthless. At least if you buy stock, you own a tangable asset. And secondly, let me laugh out loud at your assertion NOW, that only the
Congress can spend and not the President. Tell me Bush was not blamed for his 4
trillion increase in the debt by the likes of people who think like you. Obama
was one of them. It's laughable today to see him talking about how
unpatriotic Bush was for running up 4 trillion dollars "all by his
"If what you say about assigning blame is true, then why do Democrats blame
the poor economy on Bush? They still blame him to this day."Here
is my thoughts on it. The economy was in freefall before Obama took office.
We were losing 700,000 + jobs per month.That is not blame, that is
fact.The economy is like a large train. It will continue moving in
its direction for some time period regardless of what you do. Therefore, it
would be expected for the economy to continue on a downward path for some time
after Obama took over.So, I think Dems blame Bush in response to all
of the right wing garbage that says counts the number of jobs lost under Obama
early in his presidency. The Right wants to pin all the blame on Obama and the
left counters.Personally? I do not blame Bush for all of the
economic ills. Nor do I give Obama credit for the turnaround.I am
of the belief that the GOP and the Dems govern similarly.Placing
blame for our ills on both parties gets me branded as a liberal. A true
conservative will always blame the dems.
The real trouble is, the country, both Republican and Democrat (except for the
first 2 years of Obama, which was Democrat only) spent us into a debt that may
cause an economic disaster. Now, with 17 trillion and growing, ALL programs
need to be cut, and ALL taxes that won't stifle economic growth, need to be
collected. And economic growth will be the only way for us to pay off the debt.
We can't tax or cut our way out of this mess. I blame Bush for 4 trillion
of it, and Obama for 6 trillion (and growing) of it. Bush can't do
anything about his mistake now. Obama can. Will he? It's up to his
constituents, namely the Democrat Party to make him do it. He won't listen
to any advise from any Republican.
Calling Obama's proposal a "cut to Social Security" is just more
double-speak (read lies) being spouted by the left. The President's
proposal is anything but a cut. It is changing the formula for the
cost-of-living adjustment from being benchmarked against wage inflation to being
benchmarked against consumer price inflation. Social security spending will
still go up every year by much more that the economy is growing (because America
is aging), and payments to individuals will continue to rise with inflation.
There will not be $.01 of a cut to ANYONE.This is just more politics
and spin. Until voters wise up to the games played by the politicians in
Washington, voters and taxpayers will be the ones being played.
Actually, these "cuts" are a new inflation formula that's actually
designed not to affect recipients who are very old and/or living below the
poverty line. People are screaming for a way to keep Social Security and
Medicare sustainable without hurting the people who need it the most, and this
is it. As the saying goes, if the extremists at both ends of the spectrum are
angry at you, you've probably made a good deal.You know, Wonder
really has you guys nailed. Nothing President Obama does will ever satisfy you,
so why should we take any of your rantings seriously?
@JoeBlow:You need to be better informed. I bring up things which
are common knowledge. Most people know of what we give to the mid-east, and
what sequester is. It shouldn't have to be explained.
What me worry. There isn't a budget. Hasn't been in years.
This seems to me to be a step in the rich direction. It probably does not go
far enough but at least we are starting to compromise. Thanks for showing some
leadership here, President Obama. I hope the folks we elected from the state of
Utah will have the courage to explore compromise positions as well.
Just an empty threat. We know he will never do this. Cutting welfare spending is
an absolute no no
Blame Obama for his big defcit that he created. Oh yeah, when will he and his
family start paying all expense vacations?
Re: Joe BlowYou may be a liberal, but a true Democrat will always
blame the Republicans. Especially when they are in power and have 2/3rds the
responsibllity. And by the way, Obama is now well into his 2nd term. If he is
as ineffective in making the economy better as he was in his first term, it will
have been a wasted 8 years.