Comments about ‘Letter: How or why are positions held by Republicans considered extreme?’

Return to article »

Published: Thursday, March 28 2013 12:00 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
micawber
Centerville, UT

When you say "Trusting and giving the government complete power to dictate all walks of life and acquiescence to socialism is what will cause the demise of our country", you are engaging in the same kind of rhetorical excess you accuse Andrew McDonald of. Most Republicans are not bellicose fear-mongers. Most Democrats don't support giving the government complete power or acquiescence to socialism. And, frankly, suggesting that there is widespread support for complete government control and socialism sounds a little extreme to me.

embarrassed Utahn!
Salt Lake City, UT

How did that 8 years of Bushco sit with ya'? I'm guessing as a proud Republican, George and Dick are without blame. Spending trillions and borrowing hundreds of billions from China was "necessary, right? Our infrastructure could have used a big boost with the trillions wasted during the Bushco Reign of Terror, but that would just be "socialism", right?

ECR
Burke, VA

So Andrew McDonald owes Kim Skinner a debt of graditude. While Andrew appartently failed to articulate why he thinks Republicans are extreme, Kim does a good job of illustrating why that is true.

"Is it extreme to be pro-life" - No. That's why many Democrats are pro-life. And please don't tell me that no Republican has ever had an abortion.

"to favor agency" unless you're making a chouice about your own body or who you will marry

"personal accountability" becuase no liberal Democrat ever supported himself

"the Second Amendment" - Please read Justice Scalia's opinion in District of Columbia vs. Heller

"voluntary charity" except for giving tax breaks to the already wealthy

"Is it extreme to oppose government waste" except at the Pentagon

"fraud and burdensome debt" the debt was tripled during the 80's when who was in the White House?

And just reading the last paragraph one can see why Andrew thinks Republicans are being "dangerously extreme, mean-spirited, bellicose and of fear-mongering." When Republicans claim their platform is made up of "righteous principles" and Democrat's positions are "socialism" I think we can see where Andrew got his idea.

spring street
SALT LAKE CITY, UT

I think the Republican Party should hold onto their views with both hands and never give in but then again I am a democrat.

one old man
Ogden, UT

One more poor, gullible soul who has been completely fooled by the GOP.

Maudine
SLC, UT

When your positions are so far to the right that Reagan looks like a moderate, than yes, you are a little extreme. When you are so far right that Reagan looks like a Liberal, you are very extreme.

When you think Fox News is a Liberal media source, than yes - you are incredibly extreme.

Do these things apply to the entirety of the Republican Party? Of course not. And those who disagree with these positions are the ones within the party calling it out for being too extreme - and this letter writer shows the response they receive.

Yes - part of the Republican Party is very extreme.

And if you really think everyone who thinks the Republican Party needs to change is a Liberal or a Democrat, not only are you an extreme party, you are also a very small party.

pragmatistferlife
salt lake city, utah

Good response ECR..let me just add a couple of little details. If you want to be believe that any abortion is evil then by all means don't have an abortion. However when the law clearly allows for abortions in some circustances, and public opinion supports such a law, to try and inact policies that define a newly fertilized egg as a person is extreme.

If you believe that private organizations with defined memberships can solve socieities welfare needs, then by all means contribute to your hearts content. However to define the position that society as a whole has a responsibility to all of its members welfare, as forced charity is extreme.

I could go on but you get the point.

Truthseeker
SLO, CA

Extreme is:

Refusing to raise the debt ceiling--(essentially telling our creditors we aren't going to pay the bill), something that has been routinely done since at least 1940--18 times during Reagan's presidency and 7 times under G.W. Bush.

Granting personhood to the unborn, 14th amendment rights, and prohibiting abortion in all circumstances.

Filibustering non-controversial judicial nominations.

Teaching creationism as a science subject in schools

Ignoring the vast scientific consensus on climate change.

Believing U.S. citizens need to be armed to fight against the govt.

Believing that 47% of Americans who don't owe federal income tax are lazy, n'er-do-wells

The Real Maverick
Orem, UT

I have no idea where we got the idea that the GOP was insensitive, self-serving, and radical...

"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. ... My job is not to worry about those people. I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives."

or

"Corporations are people my friend!"

or

"I like being able to fire people."

or

"the single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."

Not to mention all the hateful comments made against women and minorities...

Open Minded Mormon
Everett, 00

How or why are positions held by Republicans considered extreme?

Is it extreme to be pro-life,
[only when it doesn’t allow for rape, incest, health and life of the woman, and viability of the fetus – as the GOP platform now stands.]

to favor agency, personal accountability,
[ I’m being forced to pay for Corporate Welfare and Wars I don’t support]

the Second Amendment and voluntary charity versus forced charity?
[BackGround Checks are common sense, and do not threaten the 2nd amendment, and General Welfare is not the same as charity.]

Is it extreme to oppose government waste, fraud and burdensome debt?
[Get back to me when the GOP has figured out how to pay $3 Trillion wasted in the Middle East]

BTW – I did a quick search Deseret News search on “Kim Skinner”. It reveals someone who submits letters to the Editor ... dare I say, EXTREMELY often.

Kent C. DeForrest
Provo, UT

It is extreme to refer to taxes as "forced charity." Taxes are not charity. They are they way we fund necessary government functions, such as defense, infrastructure, air and water quality, the judicial system, and taking care of the elderly, disabled, and disadvantaged. Because we have been unwilling to tax at a sufficient level to pay for what both parties agree are necessary expenditures, we have growing debt.

But if Kim Skinner is of the opinion that we should leave all these government functions to "volunteer charity," we will soon have a vulnerable, crumbling, polluted, crime-ridden, and destitute society, because, as been shown by study after study, those who reap the greatest rewards from our economic system are actually the least charitable. Volunteer charity can't even keep up with what government is unable to do.

one vote
Salt Lake City, UT

Because most listen to Limbaugh yell and spit venom daily.

Open Minded Mormon
Everett, 00

More examples of the GOP being extreme...

The poor, sick and the elderly can all be denied Healthcare due to pre-existing conditions.

The earth is only 6,000 years old.

That Blastula is a human being.

That Corporations are "people".

Climate Change is Hoax.

47% of the U.S. population is stereotyped as a bunch of lazy free loaders.

That the 2nd amendment allows for criminals and the mentally insane to have unlimited access to weapons.

That Racial Profiling is OK.

That a woman who is "legitimately raped" has ways of naturally reversing her pregnancy.

That LGBTs can be categorized as sub-human or sub-citizens.
[I recall the GOP spending years saying - "Equal Rights, Not Special Rights"? So, what say you now?]

RedShirt
USS Enterprise, UT

It is funny to see the liberals ranting about their favorite talking points between Repbulicans and Democrats. The fact is that the policies that most of the Republicans that are currently in office have are not that different than the Democrats.

With most of the comments here it is like watching a Marxist debate a Fabian Socialist about why the Fabian's views are so extreme.

To "Open Minded Mormon" you realize that liberals/progressives do not advocate for personal responsibility. That is how we ended up with SS, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, and the countless social welfare programs in the first place. Your ilk believe that you shouldn't have to pay the consequences for their mistakes.

Counter Intelligence
Salt Lake City, UT

I see most of the posters here come from the Chris Matthews school of tolerance: I.E engage in some prophylactic bigotry and call everyone who disagrees with you a racist/extremist in an attempt to put them on the defensive and hope no one notices your own extremism (i.e. no limitations on abortion in the Democratic platform; stage managing a phony tea party incident in hopes of provoking antagonism, and when it doesn’t happen - call them racist anyhow; spend thousands of dollars to attend a Catholic university so you can claim you are a victim when they don’t pay for your $10 birth control - then claim there is a war on women – to divert attention from your own war on rational thought, etc. etc.)

Trouble is: Matthews (et al) is a complete absolute total joke

Gorbechov callign Reagan an extremist - really says more about Gorbechov than Reagan

The letter writer should be proud of his point; as illustrated by the hysteria it evokes from left-wing "extremists"

Irony Guy
Bountiful, Utah

OK, writer, so your positions are not extreme or extreem or x-stream. Fine. They're still fraught with nasty consequences. The difference between liberal and conservative is clear: "We're in this together" versus "You're on your own, Pal."

Halach Huinic
Mapleton, UT

When I hear the constant tirade of the Republican right against our federal government and against President Obama personally, I wonder how different that is from how Anthony Kuck describes the mental state of his close friend, Jared Loughner?

"I know he has some crazy thoughts where he ... just believes the government is corrupt, and he has all these assumptions on things, that he doesn't really know what he's talking about. He just seemed to have some kind of ... hate for government."

Now some may excuse this drumbeat of virulence as righteous indignation. However, to me this is the worrisome side of extremism that I find so threatening.

Ajax
Mapleton, UT

I couldn't agree more with the comments of Irony Guy.

Either everyone matters or no one matters.

Counter Intelligence
Salt Lake City, UT

Halach Huinic
The implication that there was a connection between Jared Loughner and Republicans is Chris Matthewesque EXTREMISM at its most hateful. Follwing the same logic; Any leftist willing to engage in such bigotry deserves to be lumped in with "open minded and tolerant" Charles Manson

LDS Liberal
Farmington, UT

It's like reading;
"The Paranoid Style in American Politics" by American historian Richard J. Hofstadter all over again...

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments