This is just more proof that "gun control" is a euphemism for "gun
ban" and that they will take any incremental step they can to achieve that
goal. "Never let a crisis go to waste" opportunists are exploiting
horrible criminal acts to advance their agenda.However, none of the
schemes they hatch actually do anything to prevent future tragedies. Indeed,
the seem to try to prevent actions that would fix the problems. They oppose
strengthening metal health records access. They oppose arming teachers, or even
added security in schools. Instead, they just create more "gun free"
killing zones, and want to disarm potential victims.Colorado
politicians, and those from any other state who stoop to these
counter-productive "feel good" measures certainly need to be replaced at
the first opportunity.Gun bans simply do not work, and never have.
"It's not the guns, it's the criminals!"
Demanding more gun control laws because criminals have too many guns, is like
having yourself neutered because you believe the neighbors have too many kids.
To Progressives: Why is it that we can't require our politicians to just
stand by the constitution, rather than pander to the weaknesses of people or
'protecting' them from themselves? Does a liberal even understand the
word 'patronizing' (to behave in an offensively condescending manner
toward: a politician who patronizes his constituents)? What do we gain by
taking away individual rights? or passing laws that patronize someone that is
made in the image of God? How arrogant of progressives to remove God from
people's lives and then place themselves above Him! Where does a
progressive, citizen A, get the right to take away from Citizen B to give to
Citizen C? When was that ever an American ideal? How arrogant and proud can
Limiting ammunition magazines to 15 rounds and expanding background checks are
not great inconveniences to anyone. Calling them radical threats to Second
Amendment rights sounds like the ravings of someone who isn’t even trying
to be rational.
Magpul industries is welcome to set up shop here.Craig,what is
the threshold? How much of a right is lost before you say enough is enough?
WH=hen there is no right left?
Craig Clark-That how it starts, far from the end!
incremental encroachment, incremental tyranny, incremental subjugation,
@Craig ClarkIf it is not a great inconvenience then why do we need
it at all?By your own admission it accomplishes little other than to
make it harder for law abiding citizens to fight back.Shouldn't
local, state and federal law enforncement live by the same law so that we can
the people can fight against tryanny if ever necessary?Is it not an
obvious infringement of the right ot bear arms?infringe = to reduce
What a shame.Liberal Californians escaping the leaders they put in
office, are moving to Colorado..