Quantcast

Comments about ‘Architects oppose Utah Rep. Rob Bishop's bill to alter DC memorial to Ike’

Return to article »

Published: Friday, March 15 2013 2:36 p.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
HS Fan
Salt Lake City, UT

Congressman Bishop has unfortunately become just another career politican.

Fitz
Murray, UT

When the name of the architect gets more attention that the person being honored and remembered, they it is time to get another architect. Gehry is world renown, but his name and design is overshadowing Eisenhower. That is simply wrong. Add to that that the family of the person being honored does not like the design, and the cost is getting out of hand, then Rep. Bishop is absolutely right in taking the track of getting other design concepts.

Unfortunately, this has become all about Frank Gehry, his designs, and AIA, and has pushed the whole purpose and intent of creating this monument to Eisenhower off to the side. When people go to see the memorial honoring someone like Ike, they should be thinking of Ike and not of the person who designed it.

DN Subscriber
Cottonwood Heights, UT

This project will cost $100 million more than expected and the honoree's family does not like it.

Other than that it is a wonderful thing. It is a monument to the insanity that infects Washington, DC, where people are criticized for making obvious and common sense proposals to do ANYTHING that might cut spending even a tiny bit.

Thank you, Congressman Rob Bishop for being a rare voice for common sense in Congress, and willing to try to make even small improvements.

However, I would much rather see Bishop stand up and try to eliiminate the entire Department of Education, Department of Energy and funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

Utah Dem
Ogden, UT

"...the responsible management of more than $60 million." ? Here's a more responsible management - don't build it.

Flashback
Kearns, UT

If you want to see a great monument to Eisenhower, go to his Presidential Library/Museum/Memorial Chapel/Childhood home in Abilene, KS. It is a very fitting tribute. Also very open and simple. Then go see his farm at Gettysburg. He was not an extravegant man. Either change the design or can the architect and start over. And, get private donations to fund the construction.

I wasn't in favor of the design of the Vietnam Memorial in DC when I first saw it. But, since I have been there several times, the design has grown on me. Very simple and powerful. It is now one of my favorite places in DC to go and contemplate, and to see my uncle's name on the wall.

Gr8Dane
Tremonton, UT

Rob BIshop is one of the few in Congress with common sense. ANd the dig at him being a "career politician" is unfair. I guess the critic who used that label would want fire-breathing amateurs as long as they juice up the crowd?

If Architects want to be uncensored with their grandiose works, then don't use taxpayers' money. If they want to raise private funds for memorial, then so be it. But as long as they're using taxpayer funds (and I don't think they should at all during these times of defense furloughs), then Rob Bishop has every right as a Congressman to take appropriate corrective action.

I think he's exactly right-on when he said that the Eisenhower Memorial has become all about the famous architect Gehery and not about Eisenhower. From what I know about Eisenhower, he'd be agahst at the Gehry grandiose design.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments