Comments about ‘What others say: Cut Congress' pay?’

Return to article »

Published: Friday, March 15 2013 12:00 a.m. MDT

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Happy Valley Heretic
Orem, UT

Agreed, and let them purchase their own health care on the "Open Market" I believe this might open their eyes to reality.

Bag Man

I think the congress and president should have their salaries and office budgets reduced 50 cents on the the dollar for the income they receive for speaking when they are sitting congressmen/women. This would help take the burden off the tax payers.

Having to pay for their staff out of their income may cut the number of staff members, and would be no different that what our doctors, lawyers and other professionals do.

Ultra Bob
Cottonwood Heights, UT

Cutting elected government wages has all the effective results as telling a child to use a smaller spoon.

The true wages of those people from their more permanent employers makes the wage from the government miniscule for their short temporary stint in government service.

A better way to get good government might be to enhance the compensation we give to our government employees to reduce the treat from private commercial interests.

Like with career appointments with life time benefits. Sort of like the theory of the Supreme Court.

Mark B
Eureka, CA

Let's see if I have this straight. We cut Congressional pay and benefits, then expect that this will produce MORE and BETTER candidates for office, including those who would be taking a pay cut if elected? You'll end up with Congress being made up of nothing but rich people laboring as their own lobbyists to deregulate companies they already own.

Utah Dem
Ogden, UT

With 47% of congress listed as millionaires for the most part cutting their pay would mean very little and currently unconstitutional, but a nice gesture none the less.

Salt Lake City, UT

Yes, by all means, let's cut the pay of elected officials, embrace a post-Citizens United philosophy that "Corporations are people, my friend," and allow corporations an unlimited ability to influence the political campaigns of legislators whose pay we have slashed.

What could possibly go wrong?

Salt Lake City, UT

It is unconstitutional for Congress to alter their own pay (one of the recent Amendments, I don't remember which); they can only change the pay of the next Congress.

Eric Samuelsen
Provo, UT

Increase their pay, and cut their campaign donations. They should be bought and paid for by the American people, not corporate interests.


RE: Blue If the big corporations are so influentual, then why did Obama get re-elected? Or, did the big corporations want him re-elected, and made it happen? Either way it leaves anti-corporation liberals and Democrats stuck.

Cedar Hills, UT

So we're are talking about cuts during the sequester. How about Barack and Michelle cutting back their lavish life style a bit?? Barack's private golf lessons with Tiger Woods adds up to pretty penny when you factor in AirForce one and Secret Service. That alone would keep the White House tours open for ... oh I would say years!! Then there is Michelle taking a separate flight to Aspen - complete with secret service and the lavish Aspen price tag. Yes yes the poor will suffer from the sequestration... but not the Obama's!! The continued and predictable hypocrisy and double standard from the Obama's is hard to stomach....but low information America approves of everything this deceitful man does unfortunately.

Utah Dem
Ogden, UT

Patriot – were you also critical of Laura Bush and her trips with her daughters or is it just the Obamas you want to criticize? Laura Bush travelled to Paris, Prague, Budapest, took both daughters to Africa but on separate trips one being a safari - quit sure that wasn't an official business.

Salt Lake City, UT

"Yes, it would be great to find a good way to hold Congress accountable for the mess it has made in Washington."


I expecting Congressmen and/or Senators to behave responsibly because their salary is pinched a bit is ridiculous. Particularly those who **we** have put and kept in power for **decades**!

If we really want to get the attention of the politicians we send to represent us then we should **vote for** politicians who **represent us** and vote **out** those who do not.

In other words, it is **we**, the people, who have the power.

Consequently, what scares me most is not the politicians. It is the electorate.

We've become too much like the government we've elected. As much as I hate to admit it, I think the government truly **does** represent us. That is scary to the max!!

george of the jungle
goshen, UT

How can they ask every one to do with out and less when they are not.

one old man
Ogden, UT

It's especially galling to understand that the automatic salary increases sucked up by our Congress members in only the last seven years is equal to a the average annual wage of a Utah teacher.

What is REALLY needed is far more complex. We NEED a complete overhaul of campaign finance laws; overturning of Citizens United; and strict term limits. Combined, those might (but only might) help bring a measure of sanity back to the Capitol.

Steve Cottrell
Centerville, UT

Remember all these negative comments about the performance of our national legislators when we vote in the next congressional elections. Certainly these same negative comments apply to our legislators. We may not be able to change their salary, but we have the right to retire them.

Norco, CA

Elected officials should be held accountable. If they don"t pass a budget when the constitution says they should, each day tardy is a $1,000 deduction in pay. That will get their attention. They will have to plan for a reduction just as we do for not following a budget at home.

There You Go Again
Saint George, UT

Doc the 5 from Utah...

5 x 175K = 875K (+ benefits)...

A drop in the bucket...

Purely symbolic...

Yet, a symbol I can live with.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments