Quantcast

Comments about ‘Republicans unveil government funding measure ahead of potential government shutdown’

Return to article »

Published: Monday, March 4 2013 5:16 p.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Say No to BO
Mapleton, UT

We really do need to cut back on government. Perhaps a real sacrifice by all of us will wake us up to the reality that government is too big and too costly. Until we feel the pain we cannot understand the impact. And when the sun comes up the next day we'll understand that we can cut.
Enough of that attitude will result in the political will to do without some perks in the name of fiscal sanity.
It will put us back on top in the world markets and be healthy for business.
Let the cuts happen.

SME
Bountiful, UT

"The across-the-board cuts would carve $85 billion in spending from the government's $3.6 trillion budget for this year,"

85 billion out of 3.6 trillion is 2.36%, that isn't a carve, its a trim. We simply can't keep running government at a deficit. When things can't go on they stop.

Mark B
Eureka, CA

This is just a GOP move to take out the sting on things they wanted preserved in the first place, while leaving other cuts in for everyone else, especially Democratic-friendly causes. One-sided sequestration - how great is that!

BYUtah Fan
Herriman, UT

The spending cuts are a good start. But they do not address the actual problem. The spending problem is in the entitlement programs. In 1970 entitlements were 31% of the budget, discretionary spending was 62% and net interest 7% in a $900 billion budget. In 2012 the budget is almost 4 times what it was in 1970 (3.4 trillion) Discretionary spending has shrunk to 38%. Thanks to record low interest rates, net interest is 6%. But, entitlements have exploded to 58% of the budget and the baby boomers are just starting to access Medicare and Social Security. This growth is unsustainable. Unless our representatives in Washington find some very rare political courage, our financial future will be ruinous.

George
Bronx, NY

So basically the republicans want to preserve funding for only the things they want and not anything else. nice to see them making (no) progress.

Redshirt1701
Deep Space 9, Ut

To "George" you are wrong. The Republicans want to maintian funding for things specifically named in the Constitution.

Are you saying that we should no longer follow the Constitution?

Open Minded Mormon
Everett, 00

All I ever hear from Republicans is spending cuts, spending cuts, spending cuts...

So, here we have a spending cut -- and they are the very first in line to squeal like a stuck pig about it, and trying to do everything they can to stop it.

The epitome of hypocrasy.

George
Bronx, NY

@redshirt
Do you really think anyone is going to pay that idea that they are only trying to maintain funding for those things that (you have decided are the only things) specifically named in the constitution? just how naive do you believe people are?

George
Bronx, NY

oops buy not pay, sorry, but kind of funny.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments