@antiagain has nothing to do with domestic drones or this thread
Re Anti-Bush-ObamaEverything in your response while true,
doesn't pertain. There is no intention of having armed drones here in the
US. Nor was I referring to armed drones when I said they could help save lives
if used during police chases.
Over 170 children were murdered in drone strikes last year. My life is not more
importnat than theirs because they are foreigners. Tell me again how drones
don't kill innocent bystanders.
Re Anti-Bush-ObamaHow would a drone used to make police carchases safer make our country less free?It seems to me this makes
it more surecriminals will get caught, and less chanceinnocent
people will get hurt in the process.Less crime, more freedom, that
is an aspectof freedom isn't it?
Have you been to a hobby shop or toy place lately? Domestic drones are not the
purvey of the military or law enforcement but rather of every manchild with a
couple hundred bucks who wants to take pictures all over the neighbourhood.
what does "innocent bystanders" have to do with their domestic use as
described by cjb?
cjbYour forgetting to mention all the innocnet bystanders who get
killed in the drone strikes. I don't want to live in a police state. I want
to live in a free country.
Drones, like guns are neither good nor evil. It all depends on who is
controlling them.An honorable government would use them only when
absolutely necessary, a corrupt one will use them as a means of controlling the
citizens.The question is, what do you think the current
administration will do with them?
Drones probably will be able to save lives by allowing police to hang back
during chasing criminals on roads.