Quantcast
Opinion

Letter: Bipartisan group of senators should be applauded for gun control stance

Comments

Return To Article
  • Irony Guy Bountiful, Utah
    Feb. 21, 2013 3:01 p.m.

    Why have laws? Criminals will just disregard them.

  • Grover Salt Lake City, UT
    Feb. 20, 2013 9:27 a.m.

    I suppose 1Con got his guns at a show so that he could stay off the database they will use to come after guns. Next he will demand that the law abiding not have to register their cars for the same reason. Cjb goes one further and says the list will be use to come after all guns are relabeled assault weapons. What channel are these folks watching? Don't anyone remind them the government fluoridates their water against their will.

  • cjb Bountiful, UT
    Feb. 20, 2013 12:29 a.m.

    When this new set of laws, doesn't fix the problem
    then the guns that remain will suddenly become
    the new assault weapons and those will be gone
    after.

    If we are to have bi-partisan agreement, let us agree
    to let law abiding people alone, and go after
    criminals. Let us agree on no more gun laws
    until we enforce the ones we already have.

  • 1conservative WEST VALLEY CITY, UT
    Feb. 19, 2013 7:41 p.m.

    The costs to implement background checks aren't worth the (possible) benefit.

    I don't really think criminals will deal with them.

    Background checks do nothing except penalize the law-abiding.

  • Mike in Cedar City Cedar City, Utah
    Feb. 19, 2013 4:31 p.m.

    I applaud them as well, but background checks alone are not enough. We need trafficing laws and limits on the kinds of weapons and magazines that can be put in general circulation.

  • one old man Ogden, UT
    Feb. 19, 2013 10:26 a.m.

    I applaud them too. But I note that none of our Congressional "representatives" are included in the list.

    Members of Congress who stand up to the bullying of the NRA need to be supported. Those who don't need to be removed.