Comments about ‘Letters: Environment hypocrisy’

Return to article »

Published: Thursday, Feb. 14 2013 12:05 a.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
one old man
Ogden, UT

We may be stuck for the time being with the transportation system, fuel types and other factors that add to air pollution. But does that mean we should not be looking for good solutions for the future?

If we do nothing, nothing will change.

LDS Tree-Hugger
Farmington, UT

What I can't understand is the hypocriacy of not knowing the differnece between "reducing" emissions, and jumping to an extremists 100% elimimination of any and all emissions.

Irony Guy
Bountiful, Utah

Another way to look at it: The people who went to the Capitol are trying to solve the problem while the letter writer mocks them and does nothing.

Dave D
Pocatello, ID

Again, to call these individuals hypocrites despite having no evidence who drove alone, or who carpooled or took public transit is counterproductive and presumptive. Why don't we all act instead of pointing fingers?

4601
Salt Lake City, UT

We all want and need clean air, that's a given. Speak with anyone who has asthma or COPD about the ill effects of Utah's pollution. Not many people, including our legislators, are in favor of smog. The demonstrators should have advocated for effective, concrete proposals along with explaining the costs involved. Otherwise they are little different from the man on the street corner shouting "Repent."

Hutterite
American Fork, UT

We're going to be almost totally dependent on petroleum based energy for the lifetime of everyone today even if we start an aggressive alternative energy programme today. It's a good idea to do that, but let's acknowledge what it will take to make that happen, and what we have to do in the mean time.

Mike in Cedar City
Cedar City, Utah

I did not see the demonstration, but although my wife and I were raised in Davis County, when we retired and returned to Utah we settled in the south of the state, mostly for this very reason. The quality of life along the "front" has materially declined since we were children.

ugottabkidn
Sandy, UT

Larry, I guess it's just too bad so live with it, eh even though it's costing us millions of moola in productivity and lost revenue not to mention healthcare costs? FYI, 4601 there were specific proposals offered to Gary the Gov and the demonstrations were more than what you implied. It's time for leadership to look past the little picture and look to the big picture.

RedShirt
USS Enterprise, UT

To "4601" but the Utah air does not cause asthma, and this is how we know.

If you look at graphs showing the Utah air quality over the past 30 years or more, you see that the air quality has been improving. Now, if you look at asthma rates, you would expect to see higher rates of asthma with each increasing age group. This is where your arguement falls apart. Those people that are 60 and over have about the same asthma rates as the youth. If the pollution causes asthma, why is it that those who grew up with higher pollution have the same asthma rates as the youth growing up with cleaner air?

Also, Utah's air is only bad for short periods of time, how can that cause long lasting problems? Think carpal tunnel, is that cause by short bursts of repetitive movements or prolonged exposure?

atl134
Salt Lake City, UT

@Redshirt
"Also, Utah's air is only bad for short periods of time, how can that cause long lasting problems? "

That logic would suggest that it'd be totally fine to smoke an occasional cigarette as long as it wasn't done frequently.

LDS Tree-Hugger
Farmington, UT

RedShirt
USS Enterprise, UT

Also, Utah's air is only bad for short periods of time, how can that cause long lasting problems? Think carpal tunnel,

============

Think urinating in a pool.
Pollution doesn't just magically go away,
it builds and it builds until eventually it makes all of it unfit for humans and otehr life.

BTW - why should we worry RedShirt -
You tell us that the earth makes fossil fuels faster than we can burn it,
that the earth is only 6,000 years old,
and that Jesus is going to come down and claen up the mess we made.

I read the scriptures, listen to the prophets, and I don't believe you.

RedShirt
USS Enterprise, UT

To "LDS Tree-Hugger" but pollution does go away, or at least most of the pollution goes away after a rain storm or when a snow storm comes through.

Where does it say that the earth is only 6000 years old? I have never seen anyplace in teh scriptures that say that the earth is only 6000 years old. We know that since Adam it has been about 6000 years, but we don't know how long the creative time was. The label of a "day" during the creative period was invented during the translations and copying process of the Bible.

I have never said that the earth makes fossil fuels faster than we can burn it. I have said that the US has a lot of fuel, enough to last at least 100 years at our current consumption rate.

To "atl134" yes, you wouldn't have long term damage if you had one cigarette every once in a while, as long as it wasn't all the time. The same can be said about pollution from car exhaust. Think about when you mow the lawn, any pollution controls there and how close are you to the exhaust?

RedShirt
USS Enterprise, UT

To "LDS Tree-Hugger" also, even in your analogy, anything bad from uninating in a pool will be filtered out or rendered harmless by the chemicals in the pool.

If pollution doesn't go away, why is it that the weather man always tells us that once the storm or weather front comes through that the air will be cleaned out?

You may read the scriptures, but you don't seem to read what I post or even have any idea where I stand on the issue of clean air in Utah.

The other problem that you and the environmentalists have not dealt with is wild fires in the Salt Lake Valley, west desert, Nevada, and California. There have been times when those fires have dumped a lot of pm2.5 pollution into the Salt Lake Valley. How do you plan on regulating the pollution caused by fires? We seem to be effected by those fires several times during the summer, more than by cars.

Lagomorph
Salt Lake City, UT

Mr. Jewkes's insinuation of hypocrisy would carry more weight and might actually be persuasive if it were based on fact and not idle speculation ("I could not help but ponder..."). The path of attributing hypocrisy to one's opponents is an easy one, but one fraught with peril, for hypocrisy knows no ideology. One could just as easily bring up the Republican legislator in Tennessee, an outspoken traditional family values, pro-life man, who was caught on tape urging his pregnant mistress to get an abortion. At least that was a factual case of hypocrisy and not the product of mere pondering. Or the fervently anti-gay preacher who, well, you know. The list goes on and on. There are many across the political spectrum whose behavior doesn't match their words. The sword of hypocrisy allegations should be used carefully and selectively, for it cuts in all directions. It is safer when it is based on reality and not supposition.

FWIW, the environmentally aware folks I know try to walk the talk earnestly (and literally, they actually walk) as much as possible. They may slip now and then, but the intent is good.

mark
Salt Lake City, UT

"We know that since Adam it has been about 6000 years"

Haha. Hahaha. Haha.
Hahahaha.

I love religious people.

- You know, only among conservatives will you find people that argue FOR polution.

Mountanman
Hayden, ID

If we could stop Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama from blowing so much smoke, all of us could breath better.

Emajor
Ogden, UT

Redshirt,
I don't think 4601 is arguing that the particulate pollution is causing asthma. He is saying that people who already have asthma react poorly when air pollution levels are high. Those who have preexisting respiratory conditions are the most vulnerable to effects. Asthma also is not the only documented health effect of PM2.5 And these inversions have lasted for weeks this year, hardly a short period of time.

mountanman,
Nothing substantive to say on the matter, but feeling the need to be seen & recognized, I see?

ljeppson
Salt Lake City, UT

"...Also, Utah's air is only bad for short periods of time, how can that cause long lasting problems?" It is inadvisable to exercise out of doors for about two months of the year - 1/6 of the year. This is ridiculous. Of course we have built our society around the automobile since WW II, so most folks didn't have much choice but to go to the Capitol in an auto. To fix our air problems I propose that we go to an even/odd system of some type so that most of us cannot use our cars half the time, using public transport instead. Seniors could get special plate stickers exempting them. Our we serious about this or not?

The Real Maverick
Orem, UT

Soooooo let's just keep kicking the can down the road and do nothing. Must be a republican.

Emajor
Ogden, UT

Redshirt,
I don't think 4601 is arguing that the particulate pollution is causing asthma. He is saying that people who already have asthma react poorly when air pollution levels are high. Those who have preexisting respiratory conditions are the most vulnerable to effects. Asthma also is not the only documented health effect of PM2.5 And these inversions have lasted for weeks this year, hardly a short period of time.

mountanman,
Nothing substantive to say on the matter, but feeling the need to be seen & recognized, I see?

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments