Quantcast

Comments about ‘Group holds gun control march and rally in NYC’

Return to article »

Published: Monday, Jan. 21 2013 12:35 p.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
rvalens2
Burley, ID

"If the man at Sandy Hook had a regular gun instead of an assault weapon, half of those children would be alive," - New York Mom

Unfortunately, such a statement is simply not true. A semi-automatic hand gun of the same caliber (at close quarters) is just as deadly as a semi-automatic rifle. And to those who want to limit clips to no more than 10 rounds ... that won't make much difference either. Reloading a 7 or 10 round clip into either a hand gun or rifle takes no more than 2 seconds.

It might feel good for supporters to pass such laws, but in reality it won't change a thing. Taking such steps, only affects the law abiding citizens of this country. Criminals will have no compunction in using outlawed weapons to commit their crimes.

DN Subscriber 2
SLC, UT

More Associated Press advocacy claiming to be "journalism."

This event attracted a whopping total of only 400 people, including zealots who came from several states. Here in Utah alone we had 3,000 Utahns at the capitol on a bitterly cold day.

Undoubtedly the NYC protesters are sincere and well intentioned. But, they are terribly misinformed, and easily seduced by simplistic notions that somehow just one more gun control law will make criminals obey all laws. They refuse to see, or accept, repeated studies, including from the Center for Disease Control that all their pet schemes have been tried, and NONE, repeat NONE, show evidence of making a significant reduction on criminal acts with guns.

Let's focus on solutions that work- enforcing current laws and locking up criminals and helping the crazy folks, not fall for the phoney feel-good rhetoric from failed schemes.

The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.

Screwdriver
Casa Grande, AZ

Regarding handguns, Reagan stated, "This level of violence must be stopped. ... If the passage of the Brady bill were to result in a reduction of only 10 or 15 percent of those numbers (and it could be a good deal greater), it would be well worth making it the law of the land."

Finally, in 1994, Reagan successfully threw his support behind the Assault Weapons Ban in a joint letter to the Boston Globe, saying, "As a longtime gun owner and supporter of the right to bear arms . I am convinced that the limitations imposed in this bill are absolutely necessary." The ban on assault weapons had a sunset provision and lapsed in 2004, and many gun advocates have strongly opposed any attempts to pass it again, including after the Newtown massacre.

Jory
payson, utah

Later that year Reagan was diagnosed with Alzheimer's. Using Reagan to support the Brady bill is like Using Obama to support Israel.

eastcoastcoug
Danbury, CT

I get a kick out of "conservatives" who are against entitlements for everyone but themselves i.e. no restrictions whatsoever on our guns and ammunitions. Then there's the argument that none of Obama's proposals would have prevented the Sandy Hook tragedy so we should do "nothing" since we can't seem to solve it.

I've got news for you people, the majority of us out here are more afraid of you who are so paranoid that you keep stockpiling weapons and ammo. How can you say gun control laws wouldn't have stopped Mr. Lanza? If he had been unable to get his hands on an AR-15 with large clips of ammunition, of course he wouldn't have gotten as far as he did. An armed guard would have fared no better than the school's security system which he shot up to enter a locked building. Lanza had far more firepower than the average security officer.

DN Subscriber 2 - Lanza and Holmes were not criminals, yet they managed to kill 40+ people. It's time we got rid of these weapons. Period. NYC has done this to great success. In the end, no one gets them.

eastcoastcoug
Danbury, CT

@rvalens2,

The killers in Aurora and Sandy Hook were not criminals. Neither was the guy at Trolley Square, nor the kids at Columbine. None of these mass murders has been committed by criminals. I don't fear being shot by a criminal. I fear being shot by a crazy person who's parents "collected" assault rifles. Truth is, my friends' kids would still be alive today, if there were no assault weapons in this country. There is no other reason why these rural communities see this regular bloodbath, other than the fact that someone's mixed up son has access to parents' weapon stash.

Do nothing, and it will keep on happening.

Ifel Of'a-sofa
Alpine, Utah

assault rifle, assault rifle, assault rifle!

I am so sick of hearing that term... and from the blind sheep who have no idea what it means... "he used a black gun, so it must be an assault rifle"

Is the average american really this dumb?

As far as a 10 round magazine limit... have any of you ever swapped a magazine? It takes all of a couple seconds!

Brave Sir Robin
San Diego, CA

@rvalens2

Reloading a gun might only take 2 seconds, but those 2 seconds might be all you need to jump on a shooter and take him down. Remind me again why you need high-capacity magazines? Do you expect that deer to stand still while you miss him 10 times?

I've asked every gun nut I know why they need high-capacity magazines. So far I've gotten two answers:
1. "It's my right." (even though I can't find a mention of that right anywhere in the Constitution)
2. "They're fun." (I've got no answer for this one)

dwayne
Provo, UT

Jennifer Edwards of Ann Arbor, Michigan said she supports a nation wide ban on "military-style guns" and that "If the man at Sandy Hook had a regular gun instead of an assault weapon, half of those children would be alive."

Comments like this one are uneducated and uninformed and seem to imply that a "regular gun" including non-military looking handguns would have resulted in more children living but its demonstrably false.

Bear in mind that the look of a gun isnt what defines its capabilities. A 30-round magazine which was used in Connecticut would take 6-8 seconds to empty while a 5 round magazine (New York now limits magazine size to 7 rounds) takes 1-2 seconds to unload and it only takes about 1.5 seconds to unload and load a new magazine.

He killed 20 children and 6 adults in 11-14 minutes. Which means under New Yorks law it would be theoretically possible to shoot up to 60 rounds (3 second reload time) in under one minute using a handgun with 5 round magazines. So a "regular gun" as she calls them could do what he did. Ignorant people should choose to not vote

Rynn
Las Vegas, NV

This group's main goal is simply wanting to stop violence. So I'm certainly not going to criticize them.

eastcoastcoug
Danbury, CT

Most of the gun murders in this country are criminal vs. criminal. Most of the murders of innocent people are not by criminals but by others with no record at all who either shot someone accidentally (e.g. the gun show shootings this weekend) or intentionally killed dozens (e.g. Aurora, Columbine, Sandy Hook, etc.).

Both groups - the criminal and the non criminal - would have a hard time killing as many as they do if we had far fewer guns. If we had the same gun culture as say Sweden or the UK, we could still have violent crime, but less murder or accidental deaths. Plain and simple.

Our murder rate is above lovely places like Libya, Iraq, Venezuela, Columbia, Iran, Syria, Afghanistan. The EU is nowhere near us. Nor Japan or Australia. We are the only "developed" country with our rate or total number of murder. We're not blowing each other up or knifing one another to death. It's the guns.

eastcoastcoug
Danbury, CT

Let me add, there are also thousands of innocents killed by someone with intent to kill who had no prior criminal record - usually boyfriends, fathers, sons (men) who are angry about something AND have access to a gun.

Take away the guns, and you might have more knifings, but far fewer deaths. Like other civilized nations.

one old man
Ogden, UT

We need a similar rally in Utah. There are SOME people in this state with some sense.

Tolstoy
salt lake, UT

@DN sub
So if they have an apposing view they are zealots but the people up on the hill where honest good people? then why did the people protesting here have to lie about where the sheriffs letter originated and about the actual executive orders put forth by Obama? Nothing Obama did with the executive orders would do one thing to remove any existing gun from any gun owner that already has the right to own that gun.

snowman
Provo, UT

A gun alone can not kill anyone. People kill people. And continuously talking about what happened glorifies what the person has done. Tho those killers are dead they got their 15 minutes of fame and continue to get it. The Constitution gives us the right to own guns and that can not be changed.

Gkwahlberg
Taylorsville, UT

eactcoastcoug, You're comment about Afghanistan having a lot of deaths is not totally accurate, as WBEZ reports, while some 2,000 U.S. troops have been killed in Afghanistan since 2001, more than 5,000 people have been killed by gun fire in Chicago during that time, based on Department of Defense and FBI data. The majority of those crimes are gang, black on black shootings, not law-abiding citizens.

Pagan
Salt Lake City, UT

Columbine had armed security.

Ft. Hood had armed responders.

Gabriel Giffords had three armed men around her when she was shot in the head.

Result?

More dead Americans.

The shooter in Colorado purchased 6,000 rounds of ammunition online and did not raise any concerns.

Zero background checks are required at gun shows. Cash only.

More Americans were killed than in every war since 1968, combined.

20 children were killed, last month.

Something needs to change.

snowman
Provo, UT

Pagan: The Columbine officers were Not armed as they were n ot allowed to have their guns inside the school. Had they been armed things would have been different.

Pagan
Salt Lake City, UT

Any proof that more guns prevent gun killings?

No. Speculation is not evidence.

Ft. Hood and Gabriel Giffords shooting prove that claim to be false.

A logical comparison to that claim would be that MORE water...

prevents drowning.

Screwdriver
Casa Grande, AZ

It's either dishonest or uninformed to say there is no difference in what is called and "assault" or "tactical" weapon.

Your own magazines and video reviews of these guns say otherwise. They claim that you can fire rapidly and maintain "tight grouping".

AND you gun nuts are willing to pay 10 times as much for the assault rifle over a hunting weapon. I'm told they are sold out everywhere but you can still get hunting rifles. Odd when YOU say they are the same.... You nuts made the names! YOU stop calling them ASSAULT RIFLES!

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments