Of course threatening a law maker is never right, but why would any law maker
want to enact a law limiting the right to defend oneself? This article should
have given details about the proposed law.
Aren't the threats a good reason why a law like this is needed?Yet the NRA has been pushing for exactly the opposite. Shoot if you
"feel" threatened. They even want to make it legal to shoot a police
officer if a person "feels" that the officer is "overstepping his
Constitutional bounds."Pure insanity. But that's what
we've come to expect from the NRA.Maybe what's really
needed is a law banning the NRA.