Comments about ‘Michael E. Kraft: No, Congress should not vote to end ethanol subsidies’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- In our opinion: Scouting success will come...
- My view: Why moderates lost the caucus vote
- Lois M. Collins: Kids' summer 'bucket list'...
- Letters: No welfare, ever
- Top scandals and controversies of each United...
- In our opinion: Big screen exploitation of...
- Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
- Letters: Government, health care
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- Letters: No welfare, ever
66 - Letter: The real death panel:... 30
- My view: Why moderates lost the caucus... 30
- Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate 26
- In our opinion: Big screen exploitation... 25
- Matthew Sanders: Imploding trust in... 20
- Charles Krauthammer: Americans deserve... 17
- Michael Gerson: As government's... 15
Corn Belt legislators pushed for the subsidy as a means of rewarding political constituents. Ethanol production is not efficient with respect the amount of energy required to produce one gallon of ethanol. The economic consequences of the subsidy has been disastrous for Mexico and other countries depending on corn as a food. End the subsidy!
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments