Quantcast

Comments about ‘Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: We predict the political haze isn't going anywhere’

Return to article »

Published: Sunday, Jan. 13 2013 12:00 a.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Utah_1
Salt Lake City, UT

The caucus system is the best way to make sure grass roots movements can work over large amounts of money. It is the only way someone with $100,000 can go against someone with $2,000,000 in election funds.

There were about 60,000 republicans in Utah that went to the neighborhood caucus elections in 2010 to elect the 3500 delegates. Add to those numbers to democrats and the primary elections and certainly the municipal elections didn't do any better in voter representation.

In 2012 the number showing up again doubled. You look at primary turnout and you will see that few voters would decide.

Most people that want the caucus system changed, there are exceptions, are frustrated that they don't have as much power as people that show up to the neighborhood election caucus meetings. It doesn't take money, you just have to show up.

What we need are more people getting involved earlier, not shutting down the system that protects us from power hungry people wanting to take over. KSL Poll earlier this year had 1 of 3 Utahns involved with the Caucus system.

This new Alternate is just a new power grab. Keep what we have.

Utah_1
Salt Lake City, UT

If you are going to run as a democratic candidate, you have to comply with their rules.

If you are going to run as a republican, you have to comply with their rules.

If you want to run and not have those rules, you can run as an unaffiliated.

There are also 3rd party.

This is an alternate path is an attempt to change the party rules by state law, bypassing the party and is even an attempt to change the law bypassing the legislature.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments