Comments about ‘New mortgage rules: Protection from banks, or ourselves?’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Business
- Airport TRAX ridership remains strong weeks...
- Writers offer personal finance advice to Obama
- Former middle-class moms choose new identity...
- Dick Harmon: Utah analytics company breaks...
- IRS probe ignored most influential groups on...
- New app helps consumers purchase products...
- Two new hotels announced for downtown Salt...
- Is the Wii U already becoming outdated?
Most Commented
Across Site
In Business
- Writers offer personal finance advice...
26 - Obama: 'Our focus cannot drift' from...
8 - New app helps consumers purchase...
8 - West Davis Corridor project unveiled...
6 - Tea party tax returns show small...
5 - IRS probe ignored most influential...
5 - Ty Kiisel: Small-town businesses across...
4 - BLM proposes to open lands near Vernal...
4



Sure am glad we've got a new government agency to protect us from ourselves. I'm so excited. (sarcasm font off...)
How long has government been trying to do this? At least three decades. I remember signing a contract in 1979. The APR was in bold print and the monthly payment was spelled out to the nth degree. How far can you dumb it down?
What we need is some way to explain things to Congress. We've got proof that people were telling them in the late 1990s that GSEs like Fannie and Freddy were on a collision course and needed serious revamping. But no one listened and the system crashed.
Conventional loans were far more conservative. It's when all the loans were packaged and sold hat we got into trouble.
The net-net is that some in government want everyone to have a house, regardless of ability to pay. There's the rub.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments