Comments about ‘Scott Klinger: Private pension deficits an underreported crisis’

Return to article »

Published: Sunday, Dec. 30 2012 12:00 a.m. MST

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Moab, UT

Ommited from this article is that the Fed Govt, offers pension insurance to corporations. Corporations can under-fund their pensions programs knowing they can fall back on the insurance policy and let the tax payers cover it,

American Fork, UT

Unfunded pension plans are practically ponzi schemes, yet legal.

Ultra Bob
Cottonwood Heights, UT

When the winning streak is over, grab the money and run.

Twin Lights
Louisville, KY

Under reported? Maybe. A surprise? Hardly.

Underfunded pensions have been with us since there were pensions. I have a significant problem with a company being allowed to enter bankruptcy, off load their pension to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and go on their merry way.

In several cases I have followed the company that went through bankruptcy and off loaded their pension liabilities is swimming in money 3 to 7 years later. But the workers who were promised benefits have suffered drastic cutbacks (the PBGC only guarantees a portion of the pension).

My solution? Let pensions be subject to a post bankruptcy claw back. For 10 years after the bankruptcy, the company submits audited financials to the PBGC. If their profits go above a certain level, they owe the PBCG (and their former workers) some "back pay".

Bankruptcy is a necessary feature of a capitalist economy. But easy off loading of contractual promises to employees should not be part of it. Pensions should be treated like what they are - deferred salaries. They should go to the top of the creditor list.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments