Quantcast

Comments about ‘World's longest fast train line opens in China’

Return to article »

Published: Wednesday, Dec. 26 2012 12:00 a.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
UtahBlueDevil
Durham, NC

Yet another place we have lost our dominance to the rest of the world. China has passed us in production. They have us beat in economic growth and finance, and now they are whooping us in investment in infrastructure. Compared to Asia and Europe, or core infrastructure is 3rd world.

You have to invest to compete. The us is the Tampa Bay of baseball.... won't spend on being competitive, and it is beginning to show. A train like this would connect Salt Lake downtown to LA downtown in less than 4 hours. We have nothing that compares, not even close.

DEW
Sandy, UT

What happened to the idea of bullet train between LA to LV which has been talked about? Good for China but in USA? Japan got theirs why didn't we do anything here?

Sky Is Not Falling
Cedar Hills, UT

HSR is good for Chinese even for a lot Asian country because of high-density residence there. Do we Americans need that stuff? Do you want build a lot of Apartments around the Railway Stations to chieve the transportation efficency? When USA becomes poorer and poorer (OMG $16,000,000,000,000 debt), somewhere like bankrupted California would be the place to build this kind of HSR system.

Johnny Moser
Thayne, WY

I have spent the last 18 months living in China. I rode the fast train one time. I live in a rural portion of the country, we see the new fast train construction for an east-west line to open in the future but will probable never ride it. Why, you might ask?
The expressway is capable of doing a similar function. That is what most of the outsiders fail to consider when comparing the US and China; miles of Freeway/Expressway AND railway mileage. The challenge that the US has with rail is our cars are way more convenient than a train.
I can drive to the airport (2 regional and one international within a 2 hour drive). The fast train might get me to Beijing in the same amount of time as the trip to the airport and flight time but it isn't any more convenient so why take it and deal with the transfer.
I will drive and fly because it is more convenient and not much more expensive than rail. Yes, not much more expensive than rail. Sure I can spend a lot less on hard seat passage on a slow train; it isn't worth it.

UtahBlueDevil
Durham, NC

@Johnny, the difference is in 20 years from now when the cost of putting in a rail system is prohibitive, your driving experience in China will be unbearable. China is already the world largest car market, exploding at levels that dwarf what is going on in the west. What the situation is today in no way is representative of the future of Japan. When the US gets around to linking its cities - down town to down town - our cost is going to be a multiple of what it is now. The question is not will we need this, but when, and at what eventual cost. But I love your perspective. I only visit China often, can't say I live there. And yes, I usually get a hired car for the day to get me around Shanghai and Hong Kong.

@sky...to your question... yes. We can't all live in suburbs. To your example, the peninsula in San Francisco thrives because works have options to get to work - in an area where housing is prohibitive. You can live in Gilroy, and work at Oracle without driving a car. It provides options for those who can't afford million dollar houses.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments