Comments about ‘Lawmakers, State officials tangle over Benghazi attack after scathing report faults management failures’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In World & Nation
- Gallup poll shows shift in views on morality...
- Defending the Faith: A case for the...
- Affordable Care Act could bring 'skinny'...
- Mothers on meth: New book highlights family...
- Mistake or miracle: New evidence on the...
- Wash. I-5 bridge collapse caused by oversize...
- Boy Scouts open membership to all boys,...
- Mistake or miracle: New evidence on the...
Most Commented
Across Site
In World & Nation
- Defending the Faith: A case for the...
64 - Boy Scouts open membership to all boys,...
45 - Journalists criticize Obama...
38 - IRS official Lerner invokes Fifth...
22 - Former IRS chief to Congress: Can't say...
21 - Gallup poll shows shift in views on...
21 - More Obama aides knew IRS targeted...
19 - US companies challenging contraception...
19



I like how Kerry blames congress for the lack of security because of funding cuts. This directly contradicts testimony by the state department themselves.
State Department Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Programs Charlene Lamb Testified before The House Oversight Committee that budget cuts had nothing to do with security decisions In Benghazi.
REP. DANA ROHRABACHER (R-CA): “It has been suggested the budget cuts are responsible for lack of security in Benghazi, and I’d like to ask Ms. Lamb, you made this decision personally, was there any budget consideration and lack of budget that led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”
CHARLENE LAMB: “No, sir.”
The State Department finally admits why the attack happened, they made a messed up or in their words "miscalculated" and did not "connect the dots". What a crock. Only problem is that the administration is blaming people that did not decide what the overall appearance was to be in Benghazi. The appearance of "normalcy" came from the top.
And our commander was unaware.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments