Comments about ‘Kathleen Parker: President Obama ought to speak out on the need for two-parent families’

Return to article »

Published: Thursday, Dec. 13 2012 12:00 a.m. MST

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Roland Kayser
Cottonwood Heights, UT

I agree strongly that two parent families are generally better for a child's development. I'm just not sure what the government can do about it. I'd support President Obama saying it, but would that really change anything?

Durham, NC

Obama has spoken on the subject a few times, but as Kathleen says;

"But the true story of fatherlessness in this country can't be repeated often or forcefully enough."

I agree. Every time I see some teenage mom pushing a stroller down the isle or side walk, you can't help but think about the cards stacked against either of them. Many have made it out of these types of situations, but only through much heavier odds against them. Far more just don't have the strength or support systems to help them fight off those things that would keep them from being successful.

So, yes, while Obama has spoken on the subject, it is a subject that can't be reinforced too much.

Burke, VA

There's an old familiar saying that actions speak louder than words. Every time the president steps on a public stage with his family beside him he tells us all, by his actions, how important having two parents, especially a kind and considerate father, is to the well being of the children. His actions and his words spoken in public about his family are an indication of the president's belief and commitment to this concept.

With everything on his plate, for Ms. Parker to suggest that the president is falling short in this category is short sighted at best. The president is doing just fine in the message he sends every day.

Powell, OH

Why not 3 or more parent families? Plural Marriage would increase the numbers and is it still "scripture" in LDS and even in some Major religions. If two are good wouldn't more be even better? After all, A billion or more Muslims can't be wrong, right?

lost in DC
West Jordan, UT

BO will not speak up to support and encourage two parent families because two parent families are less likely to be dependent on government, thereby reducing BO's power base.

Bronx, NY

@lost in dc
So then explain to us why more married people voted for Obama then Romney and why more wealthy people voted for Obama then Romney. Your tired old rhetoric holds no water when held up against the facts.time for some new material.

Stalwart Sentinel
San Jose, CA


Of the ten states that voted for Obama in 2012 by the largest margins (CA, VT, CT, NJ, NY, MA, RI, DE, MD, IL) they have a combined GDP (2010) of $5,283,800,000,000.

Of the ten states that voted for Romney in 2012 by the largest margins (UT, WY, ID, AL, KY, AR, KS, NE, OK, WV) they have a combined GDP (2010) of $1,096,700,000,000.

In other words, the ten states that most favored Romney produce only about 21% of the wealth created by the ten that most favored Obama.

When we compare the per capita GDP average, the Obama ten average is $54,947.40 while the Romney ten is $42,139.60. That means, the average American in one of the Obama group will create about 131% of the wealth that will be created by an average American in the Romney group.

Of the Obama ten, roughly 13.6% of the population is on food stamps. Of the Romney ten, it is 15.6%.

All ten of the most educated states voted for Obama. Nine of the ten least educated voted Romney.

You've been sold a bill of goods.

Salt Lake City, UT

@lost in DC
If being dependent was Obama's "power base" then he'd have crushed Romney in Mississippi which is the state with the highest percentage of people among the 47%, the worst poverty, the worst obesity rates, the worst education, the worst infant mortality, the worst STD rates...

one old man
Ogden, UT

Here's a case in which Obama leads by example.

Besides, if he did speak up about this his words would be twisted into some kind of unrecognizable misquote by the right wing zealots. And in Utah, parents would have to give written permission for their children to be allowed to listen.

Open Minded Mormon
Everett, 00

Why should he need to speak out?
He lives it by his own example.

BTW - I recall when was first elected one of the very 1st things he did was speak to Children about staying in School, and getting a good education, and taking personal responsibilty for it.

I rember how many Utah Republicans made their kids stay home and skip it all together,
it was all some sort of his evil Socialist mind-control plot.

They didn't pay any attention then,
What makes anyone think they'd pay attention now?

BTW - What a stupid and silly example those parent taught their kids about America that day!

West Jordan, UT

Am I the only one who sees the answer to Miss Parkers question as obvious? Obama got elected by minorities and fringe groups, not "Ozzie and Harriet". Of course he's not going to condone the alternate lifestyles of his supporters then turn around and say, "Oh by the way, if you have children they should have a father at home too, like the people who didn't vote for me."
And how sad a commentary is it when Prof. Graglias truthful observation that the single parent black culture isn't good, gets him attacked. How sad, as Parker says, if Obama would say the same thing it would be lauded. Who the messenger of truth is shouldn't matter. But then history has shown the more truthful a person is, the more likely He is to get crucified.

Stalwart Sentinel
San Jose, CA

Lledrav - According to the National Campaign's 2010 study, the eleven states w/ the highest single-parent family percentages were MI, LA, SC, NM, AL, FL, AR, GA, TN, RI, NC. 8 of those states are considered conservative (all voted for Romney), 2 can be considered purple (voted for Obama), and only one is blue (RI). So, 73% of the states w/ the highest single-parent family percentage are conservative and voted for Romney while only 9% are liberal.

For you, and lost, et all: At what point does the factual landscape of an argument become so overwhelmingly dispositive of your position that you will finally change it?

As an aside, supporting SSM is supporting a two-parent family, which is primarily (and almost exclusively now) opposed by conservatives.

Everett, 00

West Jordan, UT

From your borderline racist - absolutely bigoted remark,
I will safely assume you are "white", most likely "male" and obviously "Republican".

So, it must really tear you up knowing we have elected and re-elected a black Democrat as President.

Must be even harder knowing YOU will be a minority race in America by 2043.

Salt Lake City, UT

George: "So then explain to us why more married people voted for Obama then(sic) Romney..."

Not true. 53% of married women and 60% of married men voted for Romney.

West Jordan, UT

I'm stunned by commenter suggestions that the government cant do anything about single motherhood. A nations policies and leader have a huge effect on is morality. Here are some ideas; The government should not pay single mothers to have more babies. (welfare) It should not hold up promiscuous women as role models. (Sandra Flucke) It should not encourage ever increasing support for, and decreasing responsibility for sexual activity. (government provided birth control and abortions) The president should not openly support gay marriage and yet be silent on the importance of fathers in the home. And last but not least, including a belief in God on its platform should not be difficult to pass at its party convention.

American Fork, UT

Ha has, as has been pointed out, spoken out in support of two parent families. Even same sex ones.

Mike Richards
South Jordan, Utah

It takes no effort for Obama to tell the world that a family should consist of a father and a mother who are married. It's just not politically expedient.

Salt Lake City, UT

"The government should not pay single mothers to have more babies. (welfare) "

So... let the babies starve is your plan?

"It should not hold up promiscuous women as role models. (Sandra Flucke) "

Promiscuous? She testified about a friend of hers who suffered from a health condition, and many women use birth control even when they're not having active sex lives.

"It should not encourage ever increasing support for, and decreasing responsibility for sexual activity. (government provided birth control and abortions)"

You just complained about poor mothers having babies two points ago when you condemned welfare. Now you want to go after people for not having babies?

"The president should not openly support gay marriage "

So we should let gay couples raise kids in a less committed relationship? That'll definitely help what you're trying to solve... (sarcasm alert)

"including a belief in God on its platform should not be difficult to pass at its party convention."

We're not a theocracy and non-Christians can be moral people too.

Clearly, you do not care at all about trying to solve the problem you believe needs to be addressed.

lost in DC
West Jordan, UT

As Chilly pointed out, you are wrong. Before you complain about tired old rhetoric you should check your facts.

Apples and oranges – you like the juice blend?

Again, apples and oranges – there are differing demographics within states, not just between states, compare which demographics voted BO, not which states. Do you HONESTLY believe welfare moms voted for Romney? REALLY!?!?!?

And nowhere is Lledrev saying babies should starve. Nice twist and obfuscation, though.

Bronx, NY

you are right chilly my mistake

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments