Barack made many promises before he was elected the first time. He promised we
would be out of war in 6 months-they are negotiating how to keep troops in
longer. He promised to close Gitmo-It's still open. He promised to heal the
planet-The US has become a greater exporter of oil. He promised our taxes will
not go up-they have. He promised we could keep our doctor-that turned out to be
false. He called a white officer in Cambridge "acted stupidly" and
"history of racism" to heal the nation-he was wrong. He rallied to
defend Trayvon Martin, then walked away when crimes of black on white came to
the forefront.Even his own base is unhappy with him. Yet they get
locked in step and march to their leaders drums. No matter what. Can't use
their own brains. But his base is made up of bottom dwellers whose only goal in
life is to take as much as they can, and wait for the collapse of this once
great nation.Last words. "The arguement that we are the richest
country so therefore...." no longer is true. We are the most indebted
For decades southern Europeans were lied to by their governments about their
sovereign debt and not to worry. Then reality struck. Our course is hauntingly
similar. Democrats and Republicans only face reality only when the other party
is in power.
Dick Cheney said 'Reagan showed that deficits don't matter'. The
debt tripled under Reagan. It doubled under Bush. Republicans are no more
responsible with our money than democrats.
Republicans have no record of lower the deficit. Obama's spending was to
prevent the economic catastrophe produced by GWB.
@mountainman - since you have this all figured out, how well would the economy
exactly would have done should we have, oh say, let 2 of the 3 auto manufactures
gone out of business, that banks had been prevented from doing any lending
because they were operating below their reserve rate, and little projects like
the I15 projects not been funded..... what would the economic numbers be since
you seem to have them... and can say with all confidence the stimulus funds had
no effect.....You have those... right? You're not just
relying on web blog blather, and talk radio non-senese. Were looking for some
real solid data to back your claims.... you have those - right?
Money is debt, period. How come everybody argues about the debt as if something
can change? Our monetary system is debt based and if no one is willing to change
our monetary system then it is like a dog chasing its own tail.
Utahbluedevil: We are not talking about Clinton and the balanced budgets of the
1990s. We are talking about Obama and his presidency. He has failed to produce
a budget that garnered a single vote in Congress in 2012. The Democratic Senate
has failed to produce a budget in 4 years.The debt that Obama is
creating is huge. How can you possible bring up Clinton and balanced budgets
when we are not talking about anything remotely close to a balanced budget? To get balance we must have spending reductions and tax increases.
Republicans have agreed to tax increases so long as Obama will get serious about
reduced spending. But Obama won't write up anything dealing with spending
reductions until after signing a bill to increase taxes. Sounds like Pelosi
saying the ACA must be voted on first before it can be read to see what is
inside.I don't believe Obama has any intention of reducing
spending unless it hurts military, Wall Street and banks.
The Obama stimulus brought the best recovery that never happened; the imaginary
recovery all done with borrowed money!
Obama's not worried, because he plans on the Federal Reserve continuing
their printing money out of thin air, to repay the debt with worthless dollars.
Guess who pays for this? Retirees and prudent investors will lose their net
worth as the dollar depreciates. Wiemar Republic in the U.S. is on the horizon.
Remember the photos of Germans using wheelbarrows of money to pay for a loaf of
bread, or their burning their currency to remain warm due to hyperinflation?The only solution for us to retain our net worth is to convert our
savings and stocks to natural resources (gold, silver, copper, or oil).
@JoeBlow "Every dollar the govt. spends benefits someone."That may be true, but maybe some people should not benefit from american tax
dollars. How many tens of millions (if not more) of tax payer dollars have
found its way into the hands of corrupt foreign powers?On 9/10/2001
Donald Rumsfeld in a press conference informed us that the pentagon could not
account for 2.3 trillion dollars in spending. The next day 9/11/2001 the
american people had other things on their mind. And, President Bush allocated
another 56 Billion dollars to defense spending.The US has got to get
out of the war business. It is too costly in the lives of the young men and
women that serve, too costly in spending, and too costly in the hate that it
generates in other countries toward the US. If the american people had only
heeded President Eisenhower's warning about the military industrial complex
back in the 60's, the country might not be in the debt that it is today.
For the sake of future generations, this generation needs to work on solving the
@mountianman...... you logic is mind bending. You assumption is that people who
voted Democrat don't care about budget.... and yet the only President who
has come remotely come close to having a balanced budget was....... drum
roll...... a Democrat. We have lots of posturing, some tax cutting, but
little actual saving any money. When it comes down to actual acts
versus rhetoric...... there is next to no difference. nada. nothing.Oh, and those deficits the hit the books in Obama's first year.....
ummmm...... those were all passed and authorized, yes, you got it, before the
democrat from Chicago took offoce.But even it the case..... the USS
America was taking on water.... was gong down... and yes, government was
spending like crazy to keep her from going under. The torpedo his the USS
America the end of 2006 - beginning of 2007. The ship was going down. What
you accusing the Obama administration of is not turning off the pumps to save
money. Lets put it this way - had we not continued to pump, the national debt
would be the least or our worries now.
I guess it's time to buy an Idaho Lottery ticket and or Publishing Clearing
House grand prize entry and hope for the best. The odds are only...1-100 million
but those odds seem better than what the future under liberal democrats
"The true tragedy for our future is that there are millions of uninformed
Americans who will buy the political demagoguery and treachery that our problems
can be solved by taxing the rich."This about says it all. On Nov
6 millions of Americans DID buy all of this demagoguery with eyes wide open ...
and with elections come consequences. I have a sinking feeling we are setting on
top of a a volcano ready to explode ... and most people are just kicking back
enjoying the view!!
On November 6th 2012 the majority of the citizens of the United States of
America voted with eyes wide open to "not care" about our debt. Whether
the debt is 16 trillion or the projected 20 trillion in 4 more years of Obama
spending it isn't a problem... according to the masses. So - for those who
actually think and understand - how do you feel about 20 trillion in debt? How
will this Mount Everest pile of Chinese debt largely effect your day to day
life? Obama has convinced HIS followers that the debt is nothing to worry about
and in fact his latest proposal was to increase that debt even deeper with more
borrowed stimulus. Paul Ryan - House budget director - is telling quite a
different story compared to Barack. Ryan has warned that this giant debt is
going to sink this economy within 18 -24 months unless drastic changes are made.
Ryan is talking about soaring interest rates resulting from lending rate changes
that are set to kick in due to our debt and lack of confidence by our lenders.
Obama isn't worried - the question is do you trust Barack? Your livelihood
and future depends on the answer.
The republican/democrat dictatorship's only solution is to increase
spending in hopes the debt will decrease. Has that worked yet? When are they
going to quit doing that?
So if our debt is so bad... And tax increases are bad...Why is our
governor going to receive a 37 percent pay increase?Where is his
increase coming from? Aw yes, the wallets of taxpayers. Because... WE all have
an endless amount of cash.
@ happy valley. If the people cared about the threat of the national debt, they
would not vote for a man who doesn't care either. It gets even worse, Obama
wants authority to raise the national debt limit whenever he feels like it
without congressional approval. Does that sound like a "leader" who
cares about debt or the unavoidable consequences of it?
Mountanman said: "Fact #3: He doesn't care and neither do those who
support him!"...Typing the word "fact" doesn't make
it so, especially when it is so blatantly an opinion.This is a hugh
problem of the fox entertainment folks, not understanding the difference between
news and opinuendo.
Not that it is surprising, but Williams loses all credibility when he (again)
blatently ignores the real facts that the Dems are looking to make cuts as well
as raise taxes. Just as raising taxes is not enough in and of itself
to solve the problem, cutting government spending is not enough in and of itself
to solve the problem - a balanced approach is needed.
I've mentioned this before, but it bears repeating: there is no way the
government can meet its obligations. Any time the government can't meet its
promises, it defaults on its obligation to one degree or another. It's not
a question of whether there will be a default because it's already in the
process of defaulting. Promises are not going to be kept.Williams is
right when he says we are ignorant of the total amount of debt we face. The
economist Lawrence Kotlikoff has estimated the total of our unfunded
liabilities. Gary North expresses it this way:"The total
obligation of the federal government to voters that is not funded at the present
time is now $222 trillion. This does not mean that, over the entire life of the
program, the government will be short $220 trillion. It means that the present
value of the unfunded liability is $220 trillion. This means that the government
would have to set aside $220 trillion immediately, invest this money in
non-government projects that will pay a positive rate of return, and will
therefore fund the amortization of this debt."This obligation
cannot be met. There will be default. Plan accordingly.
If you want to help your children and grandchildren, teach them about investing,
teach them about money, teach them how to be rich vs. being a bean counter. I
think the American outlook would be much different if we taught the generations
how to own a business instead of wroking at someone else's business (and
running up huge college debt in the meantime for the privilage).
America Voted for Obama.If it wasn't so painful it would be
Fact #1: Barrack Obama has borrowed more money than all the other Presidents
combined up until GWB's 5th month in office! Fact #2: He plans to
continue to borrow even more as evidenced by his refusal to cut spending and
increase entitlements!Fact #3: He doesn't care and neither do those
who support him!Fact #4: This has weakened the strength of our dollar and
is our nation's greatest threat!Fact #5: It will destroy our economy,
wipe out your and my retirement savings and increase poverty!Fact #6:
Obama and the Democrats will blame the Republicans and the news media will swear
So, you've just made a case for raising taxes or the country will be
destroyed. Not the usual conservative approach but whatever.Or we
can just default and the south can split off like you "patriots" really
Some dire problems in our future, and this article is calling for an honest look
at the problems!? Washington will never go for that! Who will reelect
politicians of any party when it's clear that the full picture of our
nation's financial status has been systematically hidden from the
public's awareness since Congress started collecting taxes?!
I would love to see how this 8 trillion dollar number is built since the entire
premise of this that this is a given number... particularly when you speak of
accruals Heck, the average family budget would never work if this same accrual
method were leverage - we would all be huddling in the corner. So I would
really like to see some pointers to how these numbers were built. The is a
important or more so to understand then this scare you to death piece.For example, the often touted "debt per citizen" numbers. Pretty
ominous sounding stuff. They are rolled out like at some point we will all be
handed a bill where we are expected to pony up our portion. But when that
number is spread over the life of a citizen - while still unpleasant - actually
put in context and a lot less ominous.So lets play with full
disclosure here. If we really are running at 8 trillion a year - lets see how
it is built so we can tackle it.
Yes, the Debt is our biggest national security issue.And I hope that
the GOP is successful in pushing the Dems to make serious spending cuts along
with some modest tax increases. It is time to put America over party.Every dollar the govt spends benefits someone. That is why both R and D are
so quick to do it.(if you think this is a Democratic party problem, you
are not paying attention)Why is it that Grover only included taxes
in his plan? When you are only limited to tax cuts with no restraint on
spending, you get the situation we are in.We need about a 3 to 1
spending cuts to tax increases. It can be done. FIND A WAY