Comments about ‘Letter: In the eyes of unions: Class warfare being waged by CEOs rewarding themselves’

Return to article »

Published: Sunday, Dec. 2 2012 12:00 a.m. MST

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
one old man
Ogden, UT

An excellent letter, and spot on.

For a very disturbing read on the subject, may I recommend and excellent book by Hedrick Smith? It's called "Who Stole the American Dream?"

It pulls no punches and assigns blame where it belongs with both parties and with America's increasingly greedy corporate bosses.

Lewis Brandeis said, clear back in the early 1900's: "We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated int eh hands of a few, but we can't have both."

Kent C. DeForrest
Provo, UT

Thanks, Dane, for the excellent perspective you present. Most Americans, particularly those dedicated to the two major political parties, are convinced that the corporate interest is the same as America's interest. Their stated goal is to maximize the wealth of shareholders and executives. As less openly stated goal, but a goal nonetheless, is to minimize costs, particularly the cost of labor. If they can do it by shipping jobs overseas, they will. If they can do it by bullying workers into accepting lower wages, they will. If they can do it by increasing labor productivity, so that they can produce the same amount of product with fewer workers, they will.

Many Americans harbor the mistaken notion that the enemy is government, and that corporations are their friends. The Founders would be appalled.

high school fan
Huntington, UT

While not a fan of greed I do laugh at you who blame corporations for our troubles.. This is not the case. The problem today is that people do not want to take care of themselves.
We as a people have never been wealthier than we are right now.the rich being poorer would not make us wealthier, in fact just the opposite would be true.

Eric Samuelsen
Provo, UT

Excellent letter, Dane. Very well done indeed.

The Real Maverick
Orem, UT

Great letter.

It exposes the truth behind Hostess's failure... Not because of the unions but because they had been mismanaged by those at the top who merely wished to raid and steal from the company and then run away as fast as they could leaving the company in worse circumstances than before.

one old man
Ogden, UT

high school fan, may I suggest you try to expand your horizons by doing some research?

A good place to start would be to read "Who Stole the American Dream," by Hedrick Smith.

It's very easy to express an opinion, but it requires some sincere effort to make sure it is a valid opinion based on knowledge.

one old man
Ogden, UT

Correction -- I misspelled the first name of Justice Brandeis. It's Louis and not Lewis.

I wasn't fully awake.

Sandy, UT

When one really looks at business failures they will see many factors but the #1 reason is mismanagement. Poor decisions, poor management of assets, poor accounting practices and not using the union as a partner in success. Unions are not prudent in every situation but if workers feel the need then that should be the first sign something is amiss. Companies often overlook their best customers, their employees. Hostess, an American institution was destroyed by more than greed at the top. It was destroyed by a false sense of entitlement at the top.

LDS Liberal
Farmington, UT

To: Dane Henderson
Orem, Utah

What and excellent letter, and spot on.

Not one mention about political parties,
just a letter reporting the TRUTH of what really happened.

I don't care if Hostess gets bought out and Twikies, HoHos or Ding-Dongs makes a come back --

I will NEVER buy anything from them again -- EVER!

Salt Lake City, Utah

@ high school fan: You cannot take care of yourself if you are working a job that does not pay you properly.

If wages for the average worker had grown at the same rate as wages for upper management, minimum wage would be $23 per hour.

Should minimum wage be $23 per hour? Of course not. But to claim that workers should be able to care for themselves and their families when, on a comparative basis, they are making less per hour now then they were making 30 years ago is ridiculous.

When upper management is making more in a day than their average employee makes in a year, that is a problem.

Middle class Americans have most definitely been wealthier in the past than they are now.

liberal larry
salt lake City, utah

Excellent letter!

We need to reward companies like CostCo that pay their employees a living wage (average about $20.50/hour), and avoid corporate Scrooges like WalMart, that pay third world wages.

There You Go Again
Saint George, UT

Class warfare is ok as long as the revenue/reward is moving up to the 1%.

William Gronberg
Payson, UT

“Class warfare” gets used often in today’s conversations and writings. 99 % of the time the context in which it is used is utter and complete nonsense. Genuine class warfare took place under the totalitarian rule of Joseph Stalin, Adolph Hitler and Mao Zedong. The class with power murdered millions of human beings. The improper use of the term class warfare is an insult to the millions of victims of genuine class warfare.

Steve C. Warren

Thanks for the letter, Dane. Well done.

To liberal larry: Your post demonstrates to me that I need to make a better effort to learn which companies are paying their employees fairly and which ones are penny-pinchers, and to buy more from those that are generous to employees.

Casa Grande, AZ

Airlines have been run by corporate raiders for years. Hostess was following that tried and true raider plan to legally steal and then blame everything on the unions.

Many people become wealthy honestly, many more will try any way they can.

Salt Lake City, UT

A great perspective on this issue can be found in the book "Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America" by Barbara Ehrenreich. I strongly recommend it.

Dr. Ehrenreich, a cellular biologist and writer, spent a year undercover working and attempting to live on minimum wage jobs. Her experiences are eye-opening.

Salt Lake City, UT

The Right loves to lay the blame for faltering manufacturing at the feet of labor due to the high costs of salaries, pensions, and benefits. Yet they give management a pass. Can anyone explain why? Management freely entered into the contracts with labor and negotiated the terms. They made promises to labor that they would manage the companies in a way that would provide the financial wherewithall to fulfill their promises. Management was unable to maintain their end of the bargain. They managed incompetently. They misjudged markets, designed lousy products, and sales suffered and companies failed. And yet labor gets the blame. How come? Labor did their job. They showed up for work and produced the widgets. If management had done their job and made sound business decisions (which is what they are supposed to do), there wouldn't be these problems.

An aside: In the 1960s-70s, executives earned about 40 times the average salary of the workers. Now they make about about 400 times. Does anyone seriously believe that CEOs deliver ten times more value to their companies now than they did 30 years ago?

one old man
Ogden, UT

Some excellent, common sense comments here.

Not many trying to defend the indefensible disparities in our workplaces today. But that brings the question: How do we break this cycle of corporate greed and help boost ordinary Americans upon whom our economy really depends, upward on the ladder of prosperity?

William Gronberg
Payson, UT

Is anyone willing to expand on or detract from the following ?

"The improper use of the term class warfare is an insult to the millions of victims of genuine class warfare."

See 4:05 p.m.

Everett, 00

William Gronberg
Payson, UT
Is anyone willing to expand on or detract from the following ?

"The improper use of the term class warfare is an insult to the millions of victims of genuine class warfare."

See 4:05 p.m.

10:51 a.m. Dec. 3, 2012


You made the comment.
What are you talking about?

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments