Comments about ‘The winners and the losers: Police officer's gift, Powerball, Beehive State government’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- My view: UDOT listened, made a good choice
- Letters: Move to the center
- Richard Davis: Abortion laws should keep up...
- My view: Why moderates lost the caucus vote
- Letters: No welfare, ever
- Comprehensive immigration reform or bust
- In our opinion: Scouting success will come...
- In our opinion: Susan Cox Powell's case is...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- Letters: No welfare, ever
70 - My view: Why moderates lost the caucus...
32 - Letter: The real death panel:...
30 - Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
29 - In our opinion: Big screen exploitation...
25 - Letters: Move to the center
25 - Richard Davis: Abortion laws should...
21 - Robert J. Samuelson: Can Americans stem...
20



I am very thankful that Utah hasn't succumbed to the temptation of State operated gambling- aka the lottery
Even I, a person often despised in Utah as one of those loathsome "liberals," is thankful that Utah has not become dumb enough to allow lotteries to mess us up even more than we already are.
Saw News item in L.A. Times today starting in April 2013. California Residents will be able to play Powerball locally, where before California Powerball junkies had to drive to Yuma to play (and lose)
I often see comments on this news site from people who support reducing government expenditures for the poor and letting those services be provided by the private sector via charities. Their argument is that payments to charities are voluntary whereas government payments for welfare are mandatory via taxes. And that voluntary payments are better than forced payments.
Couldn't that same argument be applied to state-run lotteries? Couldn't it be argued that state-run lotteries are nothing more than voluntarily paid taxes? And why are voluntarily paid charitable contributions acceptable while voluntarily paid tax payments are not?
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments