Comments about ‘Hamblin & Peterson: The function of Shariah law in Egypt’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Faith
- Sister Frances J. Monson's legacy of love...
- LDS Church responds to Boy Scouts of...
- Letters to family show Steven Powell still...
- Live streaming: Frances J. Monson funeral
- Defending the Faith: A case for the...
- Boy Scouts of America to make membership...
- 'Hollywood goes to Mormon country': BYU...
- 'Tattooed Mormon' Al Fox shares her...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Faith
- 'Tattooed Mormon' Al Fox shares her...
40 - Defending the Faith: A case for the...
40 - Secretary of State John Kerry says...
26 - Muslim leaders in U.S. facing...
25 - 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah...
23 - Wright Words: Oklahoma tornado provides...
23 - Letters to family show Steven Powell...
20 - Supreme Court to weigh in on...
17



This article does not reflect the reality of the world that exists, although it may reflect the sincere beliefs of those who wrote it.
If the Muslims only wanted to live under Sharia law themselves, fine, it is their faith and I will respect that.
When they insist that jihad against all infidels and conversion by force or death to infidels is part of that faith, then my tolerance vanishes and I must resist by all means necessary to protect the life, freedom and faith of myself and my family.
There is a huge difference between tolerance and stupidity, and those who view Islam as some sort of quirky but harmless sect fail to see that difference.
DN Subscriber, I don't think the forced conversion v. death idea is part of sharia law. James Toronto wrote an interesting summary of the current debate about sharia for the BYU Humanities magazine. You can read by Googling the following:
James Toronto, 'The Current Status of the Debate about Islamic Law and Religious Liberty,' Humanities at BYU, Winter 2012, p. 11.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments