Trend of 'flipping classrooms' helps teachers to personalize education
Flipping does not negate the necessity of a good teacher! In fact, a teacher
who is prepared to individually meet the needs of an entire class is necessary.
The videos (5-10 minutes) are "front loading" of information. Students
come to class more prepared to ask questions and practice the concepts.
Teaching still occurs in this model. Flipping allows the teacher to spend more
time working one on one with individual students., meeting their individual
learning needs. In order for this time to be productive, a great teacher is
necessary. For those teachers or parents that think
"flipping" is easy, you are wrong. It is more work! Teachers who choose
a flipped classroom do so because they feel it is the best way to meet their
I haven't started flipping as a teacher but want to investigate it further.
I would agree that any "lecture" or lesson should be in the 10-20
minute time frame--for a lot of reasons. My daughter's math teacher uses
these Kahn lessons. Just because he's rich and has a hedge fund
doesn't stop them from being valuable if they are well done. They have
helped her and us as parents as we try to learn some things so we can help her.
As I said originally, flipping has many drawbacks or challenges or obstacles.
It isn't the solution to all that ails education. It is a small piece of
the pie but it also doesn't mean that the idea doesn't have some value
because parents don't want their children to do too much homework or God
forbid a rich person came up with an idea that could help students learn...
One Old Man, really? If this teaching idea where students watch a lecture from
home and work on math problems at school is socialism, I'm wondering what
you think capitalistic math instruction looks like? Or communist math
instruction? Or fascist math instruction? Please enlighten us.
My seventh-grade son's science teacher does this. He shot the video, so it
is him explaining in the lecture. He explained at back-to-school night that this
allows them to have labs and do fun things during class. If the kids understand
the lecture the first time, they don't need to watch again, but if they
need a bit of time to write it down, and internalize it, they have time to do
that. Because the teacher is the one giving recording the lectures, he is the
one the kids can ask for help the next day. It works for his class and as a
parent, I'd rather have my son doing something productive on the computer.
The teacher also keeps the lectures online to 15 minutes.
Thanks to all above for your comments. When I first read this article, it
sounded like a good idea and I was going to send to our school board. After
reading your many good points, I am rethinking. I would like to learn more
about the pros and cons of this idea.
Not only do families need internet. They need MULTIPLE means to access the
internet, or else your family ends up fighting for the computer all the time
because each of the kids has homework. (Already happening at my
house... kind of annoying... but I'm not giving my kids their own
This is SO SO SO SO important to have EVERYTHING captioned/subtitled onscreen.
It could be dangerous for those students who struggle to hear, and/or have
parents who don't hear. I like the concept - it needs to be
mixed up, to be sure --- not ALL the time and certainly NOT for ALL the classes,
but I do like the idea of making the instruction time at home (where parents can
watch/learn along) and then the actual practice time with the teacher in class
to guide them/reteach certain portions. This has the additional
advantage that students who already know how to do this particular exercise can
just go to practice, while those for whom the concept is totally foreign can
watch it a few more times to familiarize themselves with the material, instead
of the teacher "overteaching" the "smart" ones, boring them to
death, and "underteaching" the ones who don't get it yet, leaving
them behind their peers.
This sure sounds a lot like homeschooling.If kids learn better at
home, why send them to a school at all? Why not get the lectures online and do
away with the brick and mortar school building?
Flipping works best when the online presentation/lecture is under 20 minutes (I
keep mine under 10 minutes) and there is about 20 minutes of writing or practice
to reinforce the learning. That is about 40 minutes of homework. The strength is the students dictate the time and place, the pace, can replay
portions they don't understand and use the videos as review later in the
year. But supportive parents and technological access are necessities with this
method. Technological access isn't really a big concern for me.
You'd be astonished at how many poor students have the latest phones and
internet access. But NO teaching method works well without supportive parents.
We had classes like this in college even back in my day, 1970 or so, and I
discovered something real fast. It is harder to learn. There is no give or take
and your attention can wander. Think about this. Is a teacher up there to give a
canned lecture or do they use the classroom and interaction to enhance the
lessons? It is very boring to just listen and watch a person give a flat
lecture. It is close to the worst possible way to learn.
This, like so many other educational "fixes", works only if the parents
are invested. Many are not. So this is another great way to lose a lot of
students in the cracks.
This is socialism and it will lead to total moral depravity. This is what
happens when you allow liberals to infest our schools.(Just thought
I'd save some typing for some of our regular ultra-conservative posters.)
Midwest Mom has a point. If a student had 5 flipped classes, the expectation
would be that the student would watch up to 5 hours of lecture at night, then
attend school all day the next day, then up to 5 hours of lecture, etc. I would
be surprised if this works over time.
All day in class. All night in lecture, at home, when kids are tired and need a
break to play and enjoy enriching extracurricular activities. People who
advocate for this have little idea about what children need and have little
regard for the value of family time. This isn't about
providing better options for kids. This is about the likes of Bill Gates
selling devices and software. Salman Khan is a hedge fund manager, who is
generously subsidized by Bill Gates. AT&T and Rupert Murdoch are on the
bandwagon, s well. Mining public education funds for private profits is the
goal. Children are the guinea pigs for this experiment.Also
consider, Paul E. Peterson, Henry Lee Shattuck Professor of Government at
Harvard University, who is a big fan of the flipped classroom, has stated that
we don't need a lot of good teachers, only a few that we can video and put
online. Then, schools can save a lot of money by hiring less-qualified aids, to
help kids do their homework, during the day at school. Do we really want to
reduce our education system to watching videos and babysitting? "Turning
learning upside down," indeed.
They are also trying a similar approach at inner city schools in California
using the Khan Academy. They have a night lab where students and parents can
attend and have access to the Internet as well as teachers as the student is
working through the instructional part.. In school, quizzes and assignments are
given online to where the teach hers see immediate results and deficiencies to
where they instruct the students individually on what they don't know
instead of guessing or delaying some sort of intervention as it exists in
traditional instruction. I like ithe concept so far but I still need to see
I believe flipping can be a real good thing, even perhaps s revolutionary thing
and actually applicable. But here is the rub.1) Students need to
actually have access to the Internet. This isn't the case, especially for
lower socio-economic students.2) Students need to have a certain
amount of background information. There's a lot of downplaying the
"sage on the stage" type of teaching but unless students have necessary
background information, the sage will still be needed, meaning direct
instruction by a teacher in a classroom.3) Teachers will need to
know how to be trained on how to use the flipping concept. They will need to
even know how to effectively prepare their own videos.4) Flipping
is a good concept for many students but not all students. Other methods of
teaching are still effective for other students.5) Flipping could
have limitations for ESL and special education students. Seeing a presentation
over and over via the Internet doesn't help when you don't understand
the language or have a disability that would prevent learning effectively in
that modality.But yet, as a teacher I'm open to the concept but
I think it still has some limitations.