Comments about ‘In our opinion: Status quo: A divided House of Representatives, Senate, and White House’

Return to article »

Published: Wednesday, Nov. 7 2012 12:00 a.m. MST

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Y Ask Y
Provo, UT

That's a lot of words to say pretty much nothing.

Ogden, UT

The only pleasure I got last night was one point in Obamas acceptance speech. He said he would reach across the aisle. Hah Hah and Hah!

Henry Drummond
San Jose, CA

I don't entirely disagree with the substance of this editorial, but I believe there is more to this election than simply a return to the status quo. No President since FDR has managed to earn re-election with so many people out of work. Even in the face of a sputtering economy and creative "redistricting," Democrats have managed to increase their majority in the Senate and even picked up a few House seats. This should give the Republican Party pause. This should have been a big night for them.

I constantly hear that Republicans want to "retake their country." They might want to start by retaking their own Party. Much of the political activism of the last two years has been aimed at removing any sign of moderation or compromise from the Republican ranks. The adverse consequences are only beginning to appear. This proved self-defeating last night. George W. Bush got 44% of the Latino vote in 2004. Last night Romney only got 27%. Bush also got over 40% of the Organized Labor vote. Last night it was the Unions that got out the vote for Obama in Ohio and elsewhere.

Its time to rethink the Republican brand.

Tooele, UT

Re: "Status quo: A divided House of Representatives, Senate, and White House"

Probably the best we could have hoped for -- government should stay deadlocked for at least the next 2 years, and a government that does nothing is infinitely better than one given a free hand to "fix" America.

Deep Space 9, Ut

I welcome the divided control of Congress. Historically this has been good for the US because when congress spends its time fighting and stuck in gridlock, businesses can prosper because the number of new regulations and taxes is minimized.

Salt Lake City, UT

The Republican party, my Republican party, has no one to blame but itself. It has allowed the party extremists to move the party away from the middle, particularly on such issues as immigration (could have used that Hispanic vote), oil and gas exploration, healthcare reform, and budget/deficit reduction.

This election shows that the American people tend to be more moderate, and the Republican party is moving in the opposite direction. I think Romney was much more moderate than he portrayed on the campaign trail, but to win the nomination he had to pander to the deeply conservative. He won the battle, but lost the war. The Republican party, if it wants success, needs to have a strategy to win the war and not just battles.

Sandy, UT

Simply put, Republicans need to become even more like Democrats to win. We have a two-party system in theory, but not in practice. It's getting more and more difficult to find any significant differences between them.

Rexburg, ID

More of the same political gridlock and economic malaise, here we come!

The Skeptical Chymist

To procuradorfiscal:

It seemed to me that you were hoping for quite a lot more when you criticized Nate Silver's predictions before the election. You said that he cherry-picked the polls, omitting or de-weighting the most accurate polls (such as Rasmussen, in your view). It seems that his more scientific approach to aggregating the polling data has been proven correct.

If the gerrymandering that was accomplished following the Republican gains of 2010 had not occurred, the House would belong to the Democrats, too. Let us hope that the party of "NO!" will find a way to compromise now that the writing is on the wall for the future of their ideas.

salt lake, UT

I realize the far right posters on these threads are really stinging from last nights loss but after you lick your wounds try reading RBN's comment there is a lot of common sense there, something that has been missing from the republican platform for to long. You do not have to become democrats we have enough of those but we do need the GOP to drop the rhetoric and return to common sense governance.

Sandy, UT

@Tolstoy: if you're talking about me (and you seem to be when you refer to becoming like Democrats), I'm not stinging at all. I'm a non-voter. I honestly can't see any significant difference between the two major parties. So I watched the election with some lack of passion because it doesn't matter who wins or loses. What matters is that the American people are the losers. And either party is dealing a losing hand these days in that aspect.

Salt Lake City, UT

The politics may look like status quo, but looking spending cuts and expiring taxes will force them to act.

President Obama tried to negotiate a deal with John Boehner to increase tax revenue by $800 billion. The deal was described as "a remarkably, even stupidly generous offer", but Boehner turned it down.

In January, the expiring Bush tax cuts and automatic spending cuts mean that President Obama will have 5 TRILLION in higher revenue without doing anything. Both sides agree that amount will be bad for the economy. They'll settle on something between the deal Boehner snubbed (800 billion) and the fiscal cliff (5 trillion).

West Jordan, UT

Some on this forum have stated that the Republicans need to rethink their stance.

I believe that we are simply becoming a minority. We are being out numbered.

The Biggest US Welfare States*

#1 - California
#2 - Maine
#3 - Tennessee
#4 - Massachusetts
#5 - Vermont
#6 -District of Columbia
#7 - New York
#8 - Minnesota
#9 - Washington
#10 - New Mexico

In fact the top fifteen welfare states are, with two exceptions, Democrat.

*From CNBC Website

Far East USA, SC

States with the highest poverty rates

Lots of red on this list.

1 Mississippi
2 New Mexico
3 DC
4 Alabama
5 Kentucky
6 Arkansas
7 Louisiana
8 South Carolina
9 West Virginia
10 Texas

salt lake, UT

So then you choose to stand on the sidelines and throw rocks at those that are trying to make a difference? good to know.

Sandy, UT

Here's a question: what would a real two-party system look like? Republicans are looking basically like Democrats-lite. Both parties are converging upon the "magic middle-ground" for votes. That's why I say the differences are almost indistinguishable.

To me, it appears that the fatal element in the Republican party is their dependence upon the evangelical wing. What seems to be missing from the political discussion in both major parties is a non-interventionist perspective. Both parties have shown they are eager to intervene in the lives of other nations as well as into the lives of their own constituents. Let the Repubs and Demos be responsible for the despicable NDAA and its "kill orders" of even Americans without due process. I want no part of that. Let them be the ones behind the erosion of civil liberties with their health laws and obeisance to Big Pharma. Let them answer for the destruction of the dollar and the widening gap between rich and poor via their redistributive channels that enrich their cronies.

Until these issues and others are addressed, there is little if any point to becoming involved with either major party.

Casa Grande, AZ

States that take the most from the Federal government

1.North Dakota
2.West Virginia
3 Alabama
4 Kentucky
5 New Mexico,
6 Hawaii,
7 Maryland,
8 Virginia,
9 Alaska
10 Texas

States that have the most people NOT paying federal income taxes not in order but Utah has 39% of people NOT paying federal income taxes.

Idaho, Utah, New Mexico, Texas, Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, South Carolina, Florida

It like a Freeloader belt right down from Idaho all the way through the Republican south.

Twin Lights
Louisville, KY


Though we sometimes disagree, I have had some great conversations with you and have I appreciated your depth of thought and analysis.

That is why I am shocked that you do not vote. I am sorry, but I find your excuse to be just that - an excuse. Some liberals make the same charges against the Democrats (that they are indistinguishable from Republicans). If find that just as problematic.

If you cannot find anyone in the major parties to support, what about smaller parties? Could you not work to put them on the ballot?

Also, what about folks down the ticket (the Senate and House) surely there are some there who merit your consideration.

I subscribe to the old maxim. "You can't complain if you don't vote".

Hope to see you around.

Draper, UT

SEY: You've said it all and I thank you for it, as it is not rocks you are throwing but wisdom and clear-sightedness. I doubt the issues you mention will be addressed by Democrats or Republicans any time soon, if ever, as those who hold the real power in this corporatocracy depend on the status quo and devil take the hindmost. Those who dare to take on these issues, such as Ron Paul, are quickly drummed out of the running and painted as nutcases or extremists.

So I'm with you, SEY--forget either party unless they address the real problems in this country and do more than talk about the solutions.

Tooele, UT

Re: "Let us hope that the party of "NO!" will find a way to compromise now that the writing is on the wall for the future of their ideas."

Americans proved yesterday that's just the opposite of what we want.

As much as liberals try to pontificate, obfuscate, and demagogue the issue, the ONE clear thing coming out of yesterday's election is, America prefers gridlock to a compromise of our principles.

We know government is the problem, not the solution. A deadlocked government is not exactly what many of us hoped for, but it's the next best thing -- infinitely preferable to one that would steer the ship of state on a deranged, immoral, accelerating heading off the port beam.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments