Re: Tolstoy salt lake, UTWhat we are hearing is that our Ambassador
to Libya asked for help when the attack started and help was denied. It is in
his diary that was recovered after his death.Don't you think
Americans are entitled to know why? Problem is Obama doesn't have an
answer he is willing to give.
If Obama really was referring to this incident as a terrorist attack then why
not come out and say it like a man. Say "this attack was an act of
terrorism." After which he should have NOT played those games he did with
the video and apologize for it. Yes the video was stupid but it was irrelevant
and he knew it all along. Obama responded like a weakling and an apologist. the
Same way he has dealt with foreign policy all along. Weak. Not my president.
It's George Bushes fault.
easy to explain, cover up and incompetence
Re: Tolstoy salt lake, UTWhy wasn't our Ambassador provided
with the security that he asked for as noted in his diary? And no, unlike what
Obama tried to feed us the attack had nothing to do with an anti-Muslim
video."You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all
of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of
the time." - Abraham Lincoln
@CI so all three comments he made all calling it an act of terror that
first 48 hours about the attack where all just general statements about terror
and not in reference to the actual attack and he is a liar? interesting.
@CIYou claim others have an irrational love for the president please tell
us some things you think he did right. Without the childish sarcasm if possible.
But But But:Since Obama used the generic term "acts of
terror" in the context of general violence in his news conference after the
attack - before he sent his minions out onto Sunday Talk shows to spread the
meme that it was NOT an act of terror but an angry mob unhappy over a video -
then he technically cannot be called a liar (right?)Since Obama did
not publicly acknowledge that the murders were actually done by
"terrorists" aka Al Qaeda, for two more weeks - even though he was
warned and he knew; he cannot really be accountable (right?). No:
Poor Obama is obviously an innocent victim of partisan attempts to blame him.
Because it couldn't possibly be true that people can see through all that
carefully crafted confusion and witness that the entire Libya debacle is
exemplary of Obama obfuscation and incompetence Nothing bad is ever
Obama's fault (and if it is suggested that Obama is actually a bad
president - it is merely because the one suggesting it is obviously a uniformed