Comments about ‘Hans Peter Ibold: Yes, fact-checking lends credibility to journalism’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running shoe...
- Timothy R. Clark: Graduation advice for my...
- Letters: Threats justified
- Snapshot of 2013 in political cartoons
- My view: Nothing sinister about Common Core
- State pensions threaten to bleed states dry
- In our opinion: New leader in Iran, but...
- In our opinion: Limit the power of the...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- Letters: Stop the witch hunt
35 - John Florez: Show leadership on...
31 - Supreme Court, Congress, citizens: The...
27 - Letter: Media failure
25 - Robert Bennett: Sticking to facts is...
23 - Letters: Threats justified
23 - In our opinion: Limit the power of the...
18 - Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running...
17



Not when it embarasses the Republican candidate. Romney's campaign staff has already said it has no place for factcheckers. You have to believe!!
It isn't the fact checking, and how much or little of it that they do that has destroyed their credibility. The journalists have destroyed their credibility by selectively deciding what they will report on, and how they report on it.
For example, Glenn Beck recently compared the first 10 questions asked to Michelle Obama and Ann Romney when appearing on the view with Barbra Walters (she claims to be a journalist). Michell was asked easy questions from the start, between giggles from her panel. Meanwhile Ann was grilled in a very cold and demeaning way.
If journalists could get rid of their overtly liberal bias, that would help.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments