Published: Tuesday, Oct. 9 2012 12:00 a.m. MDT
Just remember the first debate of 2004: John Kerry eviscerated G. W. Bush, Bush
won anyway. In the first debate of 1984, Walter Mondale was the clear winner.
Reagan appeared confused and muddled, many people thought that the debate showed
him to be clearly too old for the job. Reagan won anyway.In the
larger scope of tings, debates rarely make much difference.
Except that he DOESN'T do much with those duties he's assigned.Instead, he plays golf and asks Hollywood hot shots for money so he can
play ever more golf at taxpayer expense.As far as Big Bird, would
YOU pay 450 million of your OWN money to keep him on television?If
not, why should the taxpayers pay that same amount to have a big yellow bird
teach the ABC's?
If Obama spent more time doing his job he would have been plenty prepared. No
time for debate prep, meeting with world leaders at the UN, intelligence
briefings, or figuring out a budget that could actually pass, but he always has
time for late night TV, the View, golf, and expensive vacations.
If President Obama had actually spent his time being a leader and governing,
this might actually be a good excuse. However, in actuality, he has spent his
time fundraising and appearing on talk shows like The View instead of actually
doing the job he was elected to do. The day following the death of 4 Americans
in Libya, he left for a fundraising tour, instead of dealing with this crisis-
which involved the failure of our State Dept to provide sufficient security and
the mad scramble to cover it up and lie about it.The excuse that he had no
time to prepare is just about as lame as Al Gore's excuse that the altitude
in Denver affected him. No excuses- it just showed that he was arrogant enough
that he thought it wouldn't matter- he could come in and win with his
obvious intelligence. Wrongo bongo!As far as PBS and Big Bird- if they
are that popular, they should be able to survive in the free market economy and
not need tax dollars to stay on the air.
Can this person be serious?? I think my head is going to explode if I hear one
more LAME excuse for Obama's debate performance. I must say ditto to the
other comments pointing out all the time wasting activites the Presdient is
engaged in. They are right on."Big Bird" doesn't need federal
funding for Pete sake. I can only imagine how much money Sesame Street gets from
all the Sesame Street toys that are sold. The whole thing is beyond stupid.
What ever gets you progressive liberal democrats though the day.
So someone finally gets Romney to actually answer a question about what he would
do if elected and the one thing that he says is that he would cut Big Bird from
the budget. Wow. Amazing. All those years of being a benevolent job creator and
he comes up with an absolutely brilliant idea to cut the budget by 0.012
percent. A whole 0.012 percent. Very impressive...
What Obama wasn't prepared for was the bold version of Mitt Romney who
walks back his proposals and then lies in a national debate. But Obama
should've been prepared for this Romney. The Republicans have learned they
are appealing to low information viewers and therefore can say anything.
Ryan's convention speech was panned for the unprecedented amount of lying.
You're right, Pat Fox-Jacobson. Pres. Obama had vital commitments, such as
playing golf, rubbing shoulders with celebrities, ignoring our allies, appearing
on late night talk shows, and flying off to fund raisers in the face of national
security threats. He just didn't have time to prepare for those pesky
debates. Now I understand.
@1conservative"As far as Big Bird, would YOU pay 450 million of your
OWN money to keep him on television?"Well seeing as I'm not
Mitt Romney, I don't have 450 million of my own money I can give. However,
there are 300 million or so americans so I think my share of the bill to keep
him on TV is $1.50. I'm cool with that.@Whatever"A
whole 0.012 percent. Very impressive..."Hey he also said
he'd get rid of Obamacare and since Obamacare is fully paid for because of
the Medicare cuts and taxes in it that means total repeal of it leads to a
deficit increase according to the CBO analysis, something like 100 billion over
10 years. So it's more like Romney is cutting the deficit by -.3%.
What is the response by the Pres? Liar liar pants on fire. Are we still in the
third grade? It is time to put the adults in charge.
So this is the latest Fox News spin, that President Obama doesn't work very
hard at his job? Incredible. Why? Because he doesn't spend half his
Presidency clearing brush on his ranch in Texas? Here's what I
promise you: you wouldn't be able to manage his work load.
It's never Obama's fault, is it? It's not his fault that he knew
nothing about the economy. It's not his fault that he didn't even
know the two-minute rule. It's not his fault that he tried to bully both
Jim and Mitt into giving him more time to ramble on about things that had
nothing to do with the question. It's not his fault! It's never his
fault! He was dealt a bad hand.Just what was he so busy doing? He's just like some of my grandchildren. When we ask them to help,
they say, "I'm busy." When I look around the corner, they're
busy - watching TV or playing a video game. What "game" has
he been playing instead of running the country?
George Bush had more vacation days than Obama... Sorry Obama can't disclose
everything behind the scenes... Kinda hard to debate a pathological, flip
flopper that takes multiple stances on multiple issues. For once, I wish Mitt
Romney would stand by anything. We democrats would respect him a lot more if he
would stand firmly on any issue. But at this point, know one knows what he
stands for. Obama will expose Mitt in these next debates, gloves are coming off
and its about time. Ryan will be way over his head in this debate. Biden is not
the passive kinda guy, he will call Ryan out on all of his lies. Watch.
PBS spending is symbolic of the bigger picture. If we can't stop borrowing
money from China to subsidize a commercially-viable children's show, how
will we ever find the backbone to make the hard choices?
"So this is the latest Fox News spin,that President Obama doesn't work
very hard at his job?"No: It comes from Entertainment Weekly (as
part of it's investigative journalism highlighting Obama's top secret
peace-keeping and economic summit meetings with with Beyonce and George
Clooney)"What Obama wasn't prepared for was the bold
version of Mitt Romney who walks back his proposals and then lies in a national
debate."Seeking truth involves more than repeating Stephanie
Cutters lies. And repeating them ad nauseum does not make them true.Obama's version of "Truth": "My mother was denied health
coverage as she died of cancer" "I will cut the deficit in half by the
end of my first term" "Obamacare is not a tax" " Oil production
is the highest it has been in years" "Solyandra was not our program per
se" "Since I've been president spending has risen at the slowest
pace in 60 years" "Fast and furious was begun by the previous
administration" "The Libya attack was spontaneous" "Romney is a
The liberals have put forth many excuses for the dismal performance by Obama.
Why not be honest and admit the real reason behind Obama's stupor: As Al
Gore pointed out, Denver is at a high elevation and Obama was suffering from
I don't want to make excuses for President Obama. Romney's a
lightweight and the President should be able to clean his clock.
Democrats see absolutely, positively no reason to make any cuts to the federal
budget ever!If we can't cut "big bird" - (who's toy
licenses are probably in the billions)what can we cut?No cuts for
"big bird", no cuts for Planned Parenthood, no cuts for Obamaphones, no
cuts to medicaid, no cuts to foreign aid, etc.Looks like in reality
the Democrats are the party of "no". No cuts anywhere, anytime. Make
government bigger, and bigger and bigger.......
Perhaps Big Bird should enlist in the military.Since those are the
ONLY jobs the GOP seems willing to create.BTW - When Mitt Romney
promised to create 12 million new jobs and no cuts but actually increased
military spending, all I could imagine was yet another GOP led war.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.— About comments