You might be a partisan hack if your response to a reasonable claim about voters
in general is to make your own wild, unsubstantiated claim vilifying the group
whose political views you oppose.
Re: "Nobody opposes a politician because they think they're a force for
good."No one but liberals, that is.
@Mike Richards"Did anyone notice that the pro-matheson posters
didn't point out any legislation that Matheson had sponsored that has
helped Utah"Because I don't like Matheson. He even wrote a
letter urging Congress to protect the Bush tax cuts for the rich. If I were in
his district I'd only be voting for him because I think Mia Love's
policy positions are worse than Mathesons'. "We know that
Mia Love stands for traditional marriage "Okay, so that's a
reason to vote against her. "We know that Mia Love stands for
reducing entitlements, including reducing government funded education for
college students. "While giving tax cuts to the rich... the
American people realize that deficit reduction is going to involve some
sacrifice... they just want shared sacrifice, and a logical balance, not a hack
and slash program attacking the poor while the rich get shiny new tax cuts and
the defense department gets even more fighter jets they don't even want.
@procuradorfiscal"If Mia were a Democrat, ANY discussion of her
policies [or even suggesting she might live in an apartment] would be loudly
decried as racist"And yet Mia's a republican, and any
discussion of her policies is decried as racist. I can tell because you
literally did exactly that a couple sentences later with..."But,
their racism is clear for all to see." And not only are you
playing the race card... "She won't stay down on the
liberal plantation"you just racially attacked about 95% of black
voters by basically calling them slaves.
@firstamendment"They know that Mia will be a powerful force for
good."Force for good? Nobody opposes a politician because they
think they're a force for good. People voting against her just don't
think her policy positions are good ideas, or perhaps they don't like her
record of raising taxes. They don't think 'wow, she could do a lot of
good... I must stop that'.@Mike Richards"He has told
us how loyal he is to Utah values and then votes with Pelosi on MOST bills.
"Speaker Boehner votes with Pelosi on most bills too. Remember,
most bills are pointless little votes to name post offices and inconsequential
stuff like that (I'm sure someone representing Alabama proposed a bill to
express congratulations for the Alabama Crimson Tide football team for winning
the BCS title game last year). Especially these days when that's about all
that can ever get passed.@The Real Maverick"Thirdly, why
should she be paid at all?"I don't think we should limit
jobs to people rich enough that they can go without. There should be some pay to
Did anyone notice that the pro-matheson posters didn't point out any
legislation that Matheson had sponsored that has helped Utah. They didn't
mention any awards that he won or agencies that listed him as a value to the
community. What has Matheson done for Utah?What
legislation has he sponsored?What legislation that he sponsored
passed?We know that Mia Love spoke at the Republican National
convention. We also know that Jim Matheson didn't even attend his
convention.We know that Mia Love stands for traditional marriage -
between a man and a woman. Jim Matheson has never said what he stands for. We know that Mia Love stands for reducing entitlements, including
reducing government funded education for college students. We know that Jim
Matheson told SLCC students that without government handouts, most of
Utah's students wouldn't be able to go to college. Jim
Matheson believes in a nanny state. Mia Love believes in self-reliance.Gay activists will attack Mia Love. Nanny state lovers will attack Mia
Love. Freedom loving Utahns will support her. The choice is clear.
I have no problem with a mayor getting a raise, however I like how the 27th
amendment does it for Congress. It does not take effect until the next
election. She should have to be reelected in order to get the raise.
Re: "Racism behind these posts? Where?"As Mav put it -- just
"oozing" out of them.If Mia were a Democrat, ANY discussion
of her policies [or even suggesting she might live in an apartment] would be
loudly decried as racist by the same people here denying they hold no racial
animus toward her.But, their racism is clear for all to see. She
won't stay down on the liberal plantation, so she's a traitor and
worthy, not just of disagreement or counter-argument, but of unfair, untrue, and
uncivil criticism.Sadly, it's just Democrats being Democrats.
Racism? This coming from the party which accused our President of
being a Nazi, Communist, Kenyan, Muslim, with a deep seated hatred for White
firstamendment said: "One thing we should all be aware of is that many of
the attacks on Mia are by comment-activists who have been here and everywhere
attacking Mormons and COnservatives."With the exception, that
I've been reading posts from these same "Folks" long before Mia and
they will be commenting long after you stop your conspiracy posts. Racism
behind these posts? Where?
Why should she get a raise in the first place?First of all, how is
it fair that she gets to vote herself a raise? That's a huge conflict of
interest as she'll always vote herself a raise.Secondly, why should
she get a raise? Just because the city is growing doesn't mean you deserve
a raise.Thirdly, why should she be paid at all? If she doesn't want
to be mayor and volunteer her town, I'm sure someone else will gladly fill
the spot. Stop asking for government handouts.Then again, is this
really that surprising? Mia Love is full of hot air. She was an anchor baby, her
family lived off government hand outs, she used student loans, and then she
lived off the government as a mayor. Hypocrisy is just oozing out of
One thing we should all be aware of is that many of the attacks on Mia are by
comment-activists who have been here and everywhere attacking Mormons and
COnservatives. They are much more brutal in their anti-Mormonism when they are
on other web pages. Since most of them are gay activists I believe they are
pushing for Liberals to be in power so that they can better push their agenda.
Mia and Mitt are especially important in defending traditional families, so they
are especially under attack by the left. Mother Jones made up that story about
her (they claimed there was no such immigration law, when there was) and
Matheson has been dishonest and misleading about her (in many ways) and she has
been attacked by racist liberals (not sure if that is the gay activists,
but they do have some serious ongoing issues with racism in the gay community,
and Pelosi's San Fran, is said to be one of the most racist cities in
America (if not the most racist). All this inspires me to stand
taller for Mia, and the free America that the Founders intended.
I work in the private sector.I haven't had a raise in 5
years.In fact, my pay has gone down 20%.Regardless the amount,
Mia Love is a Tea-Party, anchor-baby hypocrite.
The writer is engaging in a little conservative fact twisting propaganda and
hoping no one will notice.Mia's salary is $830 per MONTH.
That's nearly $10,000 per year. Not bad for a part time job. As a member
of my city council, I and others, including the mayor, donated our time in a
town that was a little larger than Saratoga Springs. Even now, leaders of that
Arizona city are still volunteers.By leaving out two small words,
"per month," this writer is trying to give the impression that
she's making a sacrifice.Hmmmm. Is it something genetic in
conservatives that prevents them from acknowledging the entire truth?
Maybe instead of attacking Matheson Love should attempt to convince Utahns that
her way is best. OR maybe folks need to come with grips, that we just don't
agree with Love's views. Getting rid of subsidized loans, for
example? Sorry, not a popular idea. Nor does it really lower the deficit. Raising taxes on Mitty, slashing the defense budget, and cutting foreign
aid to Egypt does though! Maybe Love should campaign on that rather than pick on
If Mayor Love's pay went from $600 to $800 why does the Utah Right's
site show her pay as $12,975? Just asking'?
The Dnews opinion page is always the perfect barometer on measuring how
desperate the right is. You can tell how desperate the Love supporters are just
by the lame letters written in her support/attacking Matheson. Obviously, her pathetic debates in which she stumbled and fumbled over answers
did not serve her well.Can't wait to see Matheson reelected in
November! Even despite the legislature's attempts to gerrmander and cheat
causing him to lose! Ha ha! Better luck next time repubs! Try and get someone
who actually can answer a question. We all know she can memorize 1 liners,
"free market, freedom, bla bla bla." But we need a little bit more
substance than Ms. Love was willing to provide. Matheson!!!
Too funny, the right wing attack squad to the rescue. How dare the truth be
told.Then you guys come on here with heresay and opinions based on lies
and accusations, to go after Matheson.Then you act as though he's
evil incarnate, and has done nothing for Utah.The republicans have
truly run out of ideas and now rely on "the sky is falling" speech for
every question.These "Utah Values" you speak of daily are
not mine, so please don't include me in your "Value" system, as I
can't bring myself to be so hate filled.Thompson, this has been
addressed, you slept thru Chaffetz running I guess.
Has anyone asked Jim Matheson who is going to vote for for Congress? He
won't be voting for himself.
Why would Jim Matheson's tactics surprise anyone? He has misrepresented his
"service" to Utah since he was elected. He has told us how loyal he is
to Utah values and then votes with Pelosi on MOST bills. Pelosi's San
Francisco liberalism is NOT a Utah value. Believe me. I spent years of my life
working at least one week per month in San Francisco. Their politics has nothing
to offer. Their society has nothing to offer. BUT, Jim Matheson let's Ms.
Pelosi dictate to him how to vote.The best thing Utahns can do is to
listen to Jim Matheson's campaign and see for themselves just deceptive it
is. Why would Utah elect a Representative whose goal is to deceive
the voters by presenting "facts" deceptively?
I agre, except I think Matheson is going to lows. It is really sad. Mia has
done wonders with Saratoga Springs, and the fact that Matheson's friends
and supporters at the Liberal Mother Jones feel Mia is important enough to lie
about is really interesting. One has to wonder why they would go after her just
as she started gaining ground, just like they went after Mitt with that
"secret Video". They know that Mia will be a powerful force for good. I
was hoping the DN, KSL, etc would do a story on how Mia's story has been
proven true, and Matheson and friends have been shown to be misleading.....
haven't seen anything yet.....what's up?