Comments about ‘Despite disapproval, someone will win Obama-Romney’

Return to article »

Published: Monday, Sept. 24 2012 10:53 p.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Capsaicin
Salt Lake City, UT

Romney, unlike Obama is a realist with real economic experience. Romney is going to cut, hack, and slash budgets. He's going to plug holes in budgets while plugging tax loopholes and increasing government revenue. Romney is all about money. He's done well for himself financially. With budget busting spending and no attempt by the O adminstration, it's almost un-thinkable that people would re-elect Obama. He and his administration have done nothing to limit the governments spending. Instead they increased rules regulations and mandates. Rules regulations and mandates ARE TAXES. It's almost unthinkable that people are willing to ignor personal responsibility to elect persons who are fiscally responsible. Obama is not.

RanchHand
Huntsville, UT

"but also to paint a picture of how a Mitt Romney presidency would be different and better."

---

You've got your work cut out for you. It might be different than Obama's presidency, but it would certainly NOT be better. A Romney presidency would be an unmitigated disaster, just like the previous Republican's presidency if Romney continues to adhere to the failed policies of that previous Republican presidency that got us into this mess in the first place.

Pack
Layton, Utah

AT RanchHand, "if Romney continues to adhere to the failed policies of that previous Republican presidency that got us into this mess in the first place."
Obama has sure done a great job of putting us into a further mess with his policies. The only positive thing about Obama getting re-elected (if that happens) would be that the dems can no longer blame the gop for the mess we are in because Obama would be inheriting a much bigger mess this time around than last time.

WHAT NOW?
Saint George, UT

@pack

A much bigger mess?

When the last repub left office, the economy was losing 800,000 jobs per month.

The RNC has been quoted as saying romney will be bush on steriods.

No thanks.

Pack
Layton, Utah

AT What NOw? What was the price of gas 4 years ago, or the national debt, or the unemployment rate? And what are those same things now? The RNC said we are dead if OB wins. No thanks.

WHAT NOW?
Saint George, UT

@pack

So, you are in favor of going back to losing 800,000 jobs per month.

No thanks.

Pack
Layton, Utah

What don't you understand? If the unemployment rate is higher now than it was 4 years ago, more jobs are being lost now than back then. It is simple math. No Thanks.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments