I have to agree with this judge and he has hit on a very important feature of
the supreme courts rulings as "opinions" and not changes in law and
order or the constitution. If legislators fail to abide by the ruling then it
becomes a breach of justice. These judges cannot and do not write
the laws by their opinions. If a law is found to breach the constitutional
boundaries, then such a law becomes void until changed or replaced by
legislative actions. When a law is wrong than all other laws related to the
nullification is also nullified. Such laws should be noted in all public records
that should cause the immediate removal of this law and all references to it.With our current president who disqualifies and calls our laws with
contempt and puts judges of his same beliefs in power for life and prove to also
violate constitutional laws then the other branches of legislative government
should have the power to impeach a judge. Judges should not be allowed to go
outside the Constitution and declare its legality or question its purpose.
Nice, my2cents: No other president has appointed "of his same beliefs in
power for life and prove to also violate constitutional laws." I'm
quite certain you are correct and it's only Obama who does that, although I
imagine you believe it's only democrats.
Why would Alito care ANYTHING about news media? He's appointed for life,
and so they can't put a finger on him unless he's found taking bribes.
As for "misunderstood", I don't think so.