"Romney has said he'll pay for those cuts by eliminating loopholes and
deductions for higher-income earners. But both Republicans were unyielding in
saying that the specifics would come only after the election."You have to elect us to find out what in our plan. I am guessing
that they don't think we will like the "specifics" or they would
tell us now.
President Obama can use his DNC to get the Union managers online with him to get
the funding he needs by the forced dues from most of the members, whether that
person is a Democrat or not. It was definitely a union type convention in word
and thoughts. If the Supreme Court of the United States did one
good thing with their decision on PACs was to level the playing field with the
way Unions had been able to tip the balance for their side for a century. The
Citizens United decision, I don't believe is good for the country as it
takes money in exchange for votes in a way I don't believe it should.
However, money speaks and that has now moved to the courts, which is
unfortunate. The robbers can now influence the courts who may be
filled with gangs of people instead of men and women of character.
Come on AP, what is this, some kind of childish contest? This guy is creating a
mountain of debt, and all you have to say is that he squeaked out a little more
than Romney in fundraising. This is not child's play. Wise up.