Comments about ‘My view: Millcreek should become its own city’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- Dan Liljenquist: Chaffetz's search for truth...
- In our opinion: Frances B. Monson's...
- Matthew Sanders: Imploding trust in America's...
- Michael Gerson: As government's ambitions...
- What others say: Assault on core values
- Letters: Deception and government
- Letters: Paycheck Fairness Act
- My view: Climate argument is shortsighted
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion



“we can transfer this municipal government without raising taxes. All city expenses will be covered plus $1 million designated for economic development”
The reason we have so many governments is that each government provides the opportunity for the developers to rob the taxpayer.
Which corporation is pushing for this?
I haven't seen any poll that indicates that the people desire this.
Henderson,
The only poll that you will see will be in November. Who would pony up funds for a scientific poll on this?
No corporation is pushing this. One factor that affected this grass roots push was the devisive option of an in-fill ordinance. The SLV Enforcement Police fee is another.
Henderson-One of the petitioners for incorporation is a principle of a high-density housing developer. There were at least three polls done on the subject, one by the Utah legislature under the then HB40 and two by Salt Lake county, a mailer they sent out and another commissioned to Dan Jones. All three showed a super-majority of citizens wish to remain unincorporated or a Township as presently constituted.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments