Comments about ‘My view: Millcreek should become its own city’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- My view: UDOT listened, made a good choice
- Letters: Move to the center
- Richard Davis: Abortion laws should keep up...
- In our opinion: Susan Cox Powell's case is...
- Letters: No welfare, ever
- Timothy R. Clark: Real job creation requires...
- Search for extraterrestrial life goes on,...
- Comprehensive immigration reform or bust
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- Letters: No welfare, ever
73 - My view: Why moderates lost the caucus...
33 - Letters: Move to the center
31 - Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
31 - In our opinion: Big screen exploitation...
27 - Richard Davis: Abortion laws should...
26 - Robert J. Samuelson: Can Americans stem...
21 - Letters: The buck stops here
18



“we can transfer this municipal government without raising taxes. All city expenses will be covered plus $1 million designated for economic development”
The reason we have so many governments is that each government provides the opportunity for the developers to rob the taxpayer.
Which corporation is pushing for this?
I haven't seen any poll that indicates that the people desire this.
Henderson,
The only poll that you will see will be in November. Who would pony up funds for a scientific poll on this?
No corporation is pushing this. One factor that affected this grass roots push was the devisive option of an in-fill ordinance. The SLV Enforcement Police fee is another.
Henderson-One of the petitioners for incorporation is a principle of a high-density housing developer. There were at least three polls done on the subject, one by the Utah legislature under the then HB40 and two by Salt Lake county, a mailer they sent out and another commissioned to Dan Jones. All three showed a super-majority of citizens wish to remain unincorporated or a Township as presently constituted.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments