Hmmm, I need to proofread my comments: "I enjoyed this article about Romney
and his family. Yes, they a rich, but they have worked hard for it." Should
have said "...they ARE rich...". And I really like the windblown look of
Mitt's hair, in the picture with Ann and the kids. Looks like they've
been having some good family time, which I'm sure has been in short supply
during the campaign so far.
@ andyjaggy, I know a lot of poor people, too, and most of them are in the
military! My son has been in Afghanistan for several months, and will be until
the end of the year, so he is getting a little more due to combat pay. But not a
lot, and he has a wife and 4 kids. His normal takehome pay is about $900 twice a
month...hardly enough to support a couple, let alone a family. Yes, he gets a
housing allotment, but they still have to pay utilities, car insurance, other
bills, just like other people. I think our military is very underpaid,
considering the work they do, and the sacrifices they and their families
make.I enjoyed this article about Romney and his family. Yes, they a
rich, but they have worked hard for it. He would make a great president,
especially regarding the economic mess we are in.
I don't have a problem with Romney being rich. I don't have a problem
with rich people in general. What I do have a problem with is the attitude that
the poor are poor because they are lazy etc.... and that the rich are rich
simply because of their own hard work. That's an overly simplistic and
frankly evil way of looking at the world. Do I need to quote scripture?I've known some incredibly hard workers who aren't even close to
being rich. The fact is our society values certain skills and talents above
others. A cabinet maker could work harder than anyone on the planet, could make
the most beautiful cabinets around, and they will never even make close to the
same amount of money that the worlds crappiest CEO will make. So often it
isn't how hard you work, or how smart you are, but it's how well
society values your specific set of talents and personality traits.We can't all be rich, society needs a hierarchy in order to function
correctly. A whole world of CEO's and venture capitalists would make for a
pretty lousy world.
Right now a vacation like that would be well recieved in my house:)
Yikes!Some folks seem to think that Romney can even bring on the rain and
prevent/put out fires.There are going be some tremendously unhappy
realities for these people to face if this guy wins the presidency.
I recommend gold fish over fruit loops too.People have a life.
Might not match our own, the toys may be different and the houses bigger - but a
break from the regular activities and getting together with kids/grandkids is
always a good thing...
Look at what is happening at the present time. We are under a moderate to
severe drought through out the breadbasket of the United States. If the current
trend continues as it appears it will the corn crop and many other crops
furnished by this region will be a crop of fair to poor. What do you think that
is going to do with prices in your local grocery stores? Do you really think
Obama will do anything about it or is it strickly up to Congress? Will it
really matter? What about all of the major fires in the western United States?
How is that going to affect our markets?We need to look at a
person's record. The only significant thing that has come out of the Obama
administration is health-care. He has only recently decided to do anything
about the immigration problem except to deport families and tear them apart. I
don't agree with the Republican Stand nor do I agree with the Democrat
Stand either. One is get rid of all and the other is do nothing until it is
election time. Romney has given generalizations but is going to do something.
A few months ago the following generalization was made about the most impoverist
household. 1) They all have a color tv probably with cable and satellite, 2) A
fairly new vehicle to drive, 3) a cell phone and local services, 4) air
conditioning and 5) any other luxury associated with a middle-class family.
What makes the difference is that most of the items they didn't buy
themselves with their own money but through someone elses money.There is nothing wrong in being rich. What is wrong is how they use that
wealth. Governor Romney never used any of the money he was paid as governor of
Massachusettes. Instead, he donated to a charity of his choice. He will do the
same as President of the United States. How many of you would be willing to
give that up if you had the money to do so? I would say not many.In
my opinion whether I like it or not Mitt Romney is probably the better canidate
for attacking the economic decline that we are suffering than any one else. We
see a nation that states the unemployment is 8%. Some will say it is actually
Ms Molli,In addition to what Liberal Ted has pointed out about him
only being a presidential candidate as opposed to actually being president, I
want to add that this is a yearly family tradition. I doubt that most of
Obama's vacations have been annual family traditions.A1994 is
also right about the differences between the two parties. People hate rich
people and think that they are greedy and just want your money. To some extent,
that is true. However, having lived in the south side of Chicago for a couple
years, in the ghetto and poor areas (I was there during the 2008 election, too),
I can tell you that poor people are NOT what they want people to believe. They
are just as greedy as rich people. The difference is that rich people want your
money through commerce, while poor people want your money through taxation and
welfare. You give a poor guy $1000 and what will he do with it? Buy a 50"
HD TV with a cable/satellite subscription.I know I am making
generalizations and everybody is different, but there is a lot of truth. I have
seen this with my own eyes.
For some reason, the fact that he doles out Froot Loops in sacrament meeting to
restless toddlers fills me with increased confidence in his abilities.Who knows--maybe if he hands out Goldfish Crackers in cabinet meetings, more
would get accomplished. It works for Nursery . . .
I love it when the true believers in the Democratic party (or either party, for
that matter) start talking about 'the Rich Guy' and how out of touch
he is. THEY ARE ALL RICH! And that's fine. There is nothing wrong with
being rich and having a boat or even TWO boats and living in a great house or
even TWO houses. The difference between conservatives and liberals
isn't money, it's liberty. Obama and his friends are rich just like
Romney and his friends. There aren't rich millionaires and modest
millionaires. They are all millionaires. The difference I see is that Obama and
his friends want to limit how rich you can become and how much abundance you can
have. Romney doesn't. Think about it. Is the President or
Congress subject to the new healthcare law? All animals are created equal, some
are just more equal than others. THAT is the philosophy of the modern
ooh I can't vote for Romney, he's an evil rich guy and I'm just a
poor covetous person. Now Obama, there's a man of the people lol
How dare he be in a boat and how dare it be from his own money. He must not
have gotten the white house memo, let the government pay for it all, expensive
trips and clothing. Doesn't he know that like the Obama's it is OK if
you are letting we tax payers cover all those costs, but shame on him for paying
out of pocket, what is he thinking???
Just you average, everyday Joe--eating his ice cream and feeding cereal to his
grandkids during church. Then zipping the golf carts down to the jet ski launch
and leaping aboard our family Sea Doos to race past the the homes of the
Marriott dynasty--stopping by the Bubble for ice cream and then pulling up at
the cigarette speed boat launch at the 6,700 sq, foot beach house---and walking
barefoot with the grand kiddies up through the servants entrance, by way of the
hologram chamber and into the TV room, to watch a little baseball (while the
grand kids play on their hover bikes). Who could NOT relate to this guy?
Romney's been blessed with a great amount of wealth, but I felt like many
of the activities he engages in are very much like my own vacations where we
visit with family and get ice cream, and pass fruitloops in church to the
restless little ones. True good living doesn't come from the acquisition of
things, but from family. Romney's a rich man for more than his money.
It's nice to be reminded of that, and to have time together as a family.
The La Jolla, Calif. house is torn up due to monumental expansion. What's a
rich guy to do?Head to one of the other homes! Must be a great deal
of extra gas used in one of Romney's planes when he has to cart the entire
family along, anyway. Right?Have we found out if the Romney's are
"green advocates" yet?
@ Ms MolliBig difference between a presidential candidate and the
president him/herself. Romney is using his own home, his own boats, his own
money, except for I'm guessing the secret service which is provided to
politiicans (congress, senate, president, retired politicians, candidadtes
etc.)When Romney is on vacation, it's mostly on his own dime.
When obama vacations it does cost millions to fly air force one, and a seperate
plane to fly his wife, and a seperate plane to fly their dog. that is 100%on the
taxpayer back. The only thing obama has to do, is a make an official speech or
something related to the office and then we are stuck with the bill.With Romney it doesn't cost us much for the secret service that would be
provided to whoever would be in that spot.The difference is, the
media doesn't itemize baracks trip for us to see how common he is. But with
Romney they like to point out that he's rich. They don't point out
that barack is also very rich and doesn't donate to charity.That's the difference.
If this was a story about an Obama vacation, many posters would be complaining
not only that he actually took some vacation time, but about the cost in tax
dollars of the vacation. Anyone going to do similar research about the tax
dollars spent for Romney's vacation (ie secret service and other
expenses)?? Yeah .. probably not .. poster boy "deserves" this
If this was a story of the Kennedy clan gathering at Martha's Vinyard, to
you think their real estate assets, etc, would have been itemized in such a way
as this article was written? I think not.Behold, the Democratically
slanted press. Nothing has changed.