Rifleman,thanks.It's interesting what liberals believe.
I had a recent discussion with a liberal associate who said we should give
single mothers MORE money even if they are using what they are already getting
for drugs and booze and NONE of it goes to support the child. Her reasoning?
There are wealthy people who make tons of money on interest income, and do not
therefore have to go to a job. I cannot see the connection.
Re: lost in DC West Jordan, UTOuch!! You're asking questions
that make sense and which would take a contortionist to refute.I
always thought the purpose for welfare was to provide for the family and not to
fund a drinking habit.
"Perkins said the bill would penalize a poor mother who simply withdrew
money to buy milk if she used an ATM in a banned establishment to do so."Why does she need to withdraw cash to buy the milk when she can use the
debit card to buy it?And what is she doing in a "banned
establishment" in the first place? Not that she cannot legally go there,
but since she cannot patronize it on public assistance, what's the point of
even being there?