Comments about ‘At Mitt Romney’s side is a determined running mate, his wife Ann’

Return to article »

Published: Sunday, June 17 2012 12:00 a.m. MDT

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Huntsville, UT

Mitt got to choose, and marry his lifemate and now she stands by his side during his campaigns.

Yet, Mitt has promised to make it impossible for certain other Americans to choose to marry their lifemates.

Clearfield, UT

I really wonder how he justifies to himself that he is risking her life and health every day she's out on the campaign trail. She has MS, and had an attack right Super Tuesday. She should be home, in a peaceful environment, and not having to face the stress of either the campaign or (if Mitt is elected) the White House.

It is irrelevant that she may want to do the campaigning. If Mitt truly cherished her and cared about her, he would put his wishes second and work to preserve his wife's health.

Flower Mound, TX

Furry, you have a good point in some ways, but if your family had the opportunity to leave the legacy that the Romney's family have the opportunity to leave, wouldn't you take it? I would. I believe there are some big things to come as a result of a Romney presidency, for the good of all of the peole of the USA. This is huge and will bless so many lives. This will probably fulfill many of Ann's lifelong desires to help as well as Mitt's. If they do it right, their life will be a life of service, and not just politics.

Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: RanchHand Huntsville, UT
"Mitt has promised to make it impossible for certain other Americans to choose to marry their lifemates."

Mitt Romney doesn't have that power. It is the State of Utah that sets the requirements for a marriage license here. Probably why it is so hard to marry one's sister, brother or cousin.

Clearfield, UT

To VST 12:03 p.m. June 18, 2012

You don't get the point. It's not Ann's actions that are suspect here -- pretty much any spouse would be willing to sacrifice himself or herself for a much-loved spouse, whether or not that sacrifice was wise. Mitt, on the other hand, shows that he cares only for his own interests and not what's best for his wife. If he truly cherished her and cared about her, she would never have been put in the position of having to decide whether to risk her health for his president-yearning. He should have never brought up running for president in the first place and, if she did, he should have said it wasn't something he wanted to do.

To Utexmom 12:03 p.m. June 18, 2012

The Romneys have shown no interest in public service in the past; I see nothing of public service in what they are doing now. A Romney presidency will not bless the common people; it will "bless" the top 1% of the counry. If was us, my husband cares enough about me that he would put me first, before anything else.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments