Comments about ‘Idling limits are 'Rodney Dangerfield' of laws’
Municipalities' rules get little respect, are difficult to enforce
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Josh Powell made 'admission of guilt' in...
- Tornado relief spurs LDS Church, Layton's...
- Couples registry gets preliminary nod from...
- S.L. draws up airport plans
- Search for Susan Cox Powell is over, West...
- 'Mantiques' could be a ticket to more cash
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet, passes away
- XanGo seeks ouster of co-founder in new lawsuit
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Mia Love announces she's officially...
43 - S.L. draws up airport plans
31 - GOP delegates reject changes to...
31 - XanGo co-founder accuses partners of...
23 - Couples registry gets preliminary nod...
21 - Search for Susan Cox Powell is over,...
20 - 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah...
19 - Gov. Gary Herbert tells Washington...
16



Focusing on automobile idling is terribly misguided. The real idling harm comes from vehicles without the same emission controls that cars have. Diesel engines in heavy trucks, locomotives, buses, and construction equipment that typically have no emission controls are bigger problems. This is especially relevant since earlier this week the WHO named diesel emissions as carcinogenic. The real problem around schools is idling diesel school buses, not idling cars. Idling commercial aircraft, which also have no pollution control equipment, are a much, much bigger problem than cars.
This whole effort is more about being anti-car than it is about being anti-pollution.
I'll know when they get serious about idling in the city when they coordinate traffic signals.
Not just passing a law to appease the EPA or environmentalists.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments