Comments about ‘Panetta: No China threat from U.S. military in Asia’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In World & Nation
- Tornado relief spurs LDS Church, Layton's...
- Abercrombie & Fitch CEO posts statement on...
- Teachers saved many lives during Oklahoma...
- Photo gallery: Tornado rips Oklahoma suburb
- Authorities: Man questioned in Boston bombing...
- One block: How neighbors saw twister's deadly...
- Fire chief says search almost complete in...
- IRS role in Obamacare adds deeper layer to...
Most Commented
Across Site
In World & Nation
- Mitt Romney talks IRS, AP records,...
65 - Journalists criticize Obama...
38 - Associated Press CEO calls records...
23 - White House insists Obama was not...
22 - Former IRS chief to Congress: Can't say...
20 - More Obama aides knew IRS targeted...
19 - IRS official Lerner invokes Fifth...
19 - Supreme Court to weigh in on...
17



"Ross Perot was fiercely against NAFTA. Knowing what we know now, was Ross Perot right?" Now why would the United States move the majority of its warships to the Asia-Pacific in coming years and keep six aircraft carriers in the region, is there something about NAFTS we should be talking about now?. Some Chinese officials have been critical of the U.S. shift of military emphasis to Asia, seeing it as an attempt to fence in the country and frustrate Beijing's territorial claims. It must be bad when the Florida Gov. Jeb Bush has no intention of returning to a ballot anytime soon, he laid them to rest in a rare appearance at a congressional hearing. Panetta wants to bite the hand that feeds us now?.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments