Comments about ‘Israel talks unilateral action against Palestinians’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In World & Nation
- Photo gallery: Tornado rips Oklahoma suburb
- Fire chief says search almost complete in...
- Journalists criticize Obama administration,...
- Should we let wunderkinds drop out of high...
- Tornado relief spurs LDS Church, Layton's...
- Former IRS chief to Congress: Can't say how...
- World War II munitions with mustard agent...
- Salt Lake City has highest rate of same-sex...
Most Commented
Across Site
In World & Nation
- Mitt Romney talks IRS, AP records,...
65 - Journalists criticize Obama...
37 - Associated Press CEO calls records...
23 - White House insists Obama was not...
22 - More Obama aides knew IRS targeted...
19 - House chairman sees IRS targeting as...
16 - Supreme Court to weigh in on...
16 - Former IRS chief to Congress: Can't say...
16



Israel doesn't have a reputation for bluffing. One morning we are going to wake up and hear that Israel took care of business while we were sleeping.
Meantime Mitt Romney is planning a trip to Israel to show them they can count on his support if he is elected president. Should help fund his campaign.
This article seems like a strange contradiction. If Israel is finally taking the stance of withdrawal for Palestinian areas and untangling themselves from trying to govern over the Palestinians why would that need to be a unilateral decision. I would like a lot more information about what exactly the mean by withdrawal and why the Palestinians would not agree to it because something does not add up. I guess as usual I will have to go to an actual new source to get the full story.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments