Comments about ‘Jay Evensen: Jay Evensen: On second thought...’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- My view: MMR vaccine caused my son's autism
- In our opinion: Utah's caucus system needs...
- Letters: Move to the center
- My view: UDOT listened, made a good choice
- Dan Liljenquist: IRS scandal is an assault on...
- Richard Davis: Abortion laws should keep up...
- Letters: No welfare, ever
- Facts about the Boy Scouts of America
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- Letters: No welfare, ever
77 - Letters: Move to the center
34 - My view: Why moderates lost the caucus...
33 - Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
32 - Richard Davis: Abortion laws should...
28 - In our opinion: Big screen exploitation...
27 - Dan Liljenquist: IRS scandal is an...
24 - Robert J. Samuelson: Can Americans stem...
21



"Mad cow disease reared its frothing head again last week. This is the disease that makes you think you can still win the GOP nomination even though your name isn't Mitt."
Mr. Evensen,
What if some people aren't motivated by a simple desire to hold political power, but to actually raise issues of importance? Ron Paul has not suspended his campaign because there are still important issues to discuss. When both the President and the presumptive Republican nominee agree on so many things, don't we actually deserve a third option? Think about these things: bank bailouts, individual mandates, government stimulus packages, government intervention in the setting of interest rates for student loans (because it worked so well with mortgages), the NDAA, the Patriot Act, sending the nation to war without a declaration of war by Congress, and promising at least two decades more of deficits. (I haven't seen President Obama produce a balanced budget plan, meanwhile, Romney has endorsed the Ryan plan, which is not projected to reach a balanced budget til 25-30 years from now). Obama and Romney essentially agree on all these things. Don't we deserve another choice?
You're right Mr. Evensen, we should have just handed him the nomination a long time ago and dispensed with this fake vetting process called the primary season. I mean seriously, we all knew Mitt was the guy anyway. Does anyone else have his hair, his pedigree, his connections to Wall St., or come across as so completely vanilla? I think next time, we ought to just do a quick poll of you media types and go with that. (sigh)
That kind of thinking contributes to the laziness and apathy so prevalent in our political process today. In effect, what you're saying, is it is unnecessary for the candidates to actually put their record and political viewpoints up for scrutiny. How discouraging it must be for an engaged citizen to see comments such as yours which preclude their right to decide for themselves. The reality is, it's totally unnecessary to make such statements. Mitt is probably going to win the nomination, but you lead others to question the credibility of the vote count or the process itself when you seek to undermine it. It almost leads one to believe that's what you want to do.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments