Comments about ‘Could there be a second coming of the Beatles?’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Family Media
- Washington Post writer: Mitt Romney lost...
- Ryan Teeples: BYU sports is for BYUtv, not...
- Men's Wearhouse fires founder and current...
- Miss Utah USA gets second chance at question...
- Superman continues history of casting...
- Video: Miss Utah USA flubs answer at Miss USA...
- Tip for living: 'Day of Defense' tackles...
- Cap'n Crunch refutes claims he's not actually...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Family Media
- Washington Post writer: Mitt Romney...
77 - Video: Miss Utah USA flubs answer at... 26
- Miss Utah USA gets second chance at... 21
- Ryan Teeples: BYU sports is for BYUtv,... 20
- NPR writer 'slightly' defends Miss Utah... 15
- Men's Wearhouse fires founder and... 4
- Utah's Hogle Zoo: Fun and educational... 2
- Family Book Festival helps make reading... 1
No. No no no. The very idea is secular sacrilege. No. Never. No way.
Has anyone heard these guys? Why are we pooh-poohing the group before we have even heard them?
Tami ... because The Beatles are one of a kind. Let's compromise: let them form their group, but stay away from the name Beatles.
I love a lot of the Beatle's songs. Today's rock has changed somewhat from the 60's generation. The talent is probably there to make some good sounds. If they are thinking to re-do the beatles songs, I have to admit I am curious to see how modern equipment will affect the sound. I would hope they will be performing their own songs too. I'd rather see the family performing the songs than a made up look-a-like group.
Go for it guys!!!
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments