Quantcast

Comments about ‘Should Josh Powell have had the right to be with his children at home?’

Return to article »

Published: Monday, Feb. 6 2012 7:06 p.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
GiantSquid
salt lake, utah

After an exhaustive legal search, I found one law that might have applied-

"Put murderers in prison."

Bubble
SLC, UT

@ GiantSquid: While you are under no legal obligation, you really should do your civil duty and turn the conclusive evidence of guilt that you possess over to the police. You probably could have prevented this tragedy if you had turned it over earlier.

Tad
TOOELE, UT

Given the evidence in this case, it is possible that the social services intervention and news media attention was at cause for the outcome. Guilty or not, there are very few people that have the coping skills to deal with everything that Josh Powell was faced with. Powell's actions were not those of a rational man, but those of someone who was beyond his wits end and under attack by everyone around him.

Nan BW
ELder, CO

In the case of Josh Powell, he furnished several clues he was up to something. There was that calm confident demeanor he exhibited, that wasn't typical. He donated all those personal items to Good Will; if he left his very high profile name with the donation it is surprising that wasn't reported to authorities. Everyone involved knew he wanted to do something to get even with the Cox grandparents, and saing some nice things about them recently should have aroused suspicion too.

All the agencies involved, law, protective services and possibly a church are over burdened with too many dilemmas to address, but this guy was about as well known as a high level political candidate. One female social worker should not have been alone in taking the children for a visit, and it should not have been in his home. The emotional trauma this woman is experiencing is horrific, and she has my complete sympathy; I'm not chastising anyone specifically, but I think collectively there should have been greater concern about what he would do.

There were also those charred pieces of wood in the desert in the vicinity of the "camp out." Considering that cadaver dogs confirmed something human there, I'm sure many law authorities believed that Josh Powell was an expert with accelerants. The bottom line is probably we have just too many messed up individuals among us to keep an eye on all of them, but I can't think of anyone that more deserved constant surveillance, as in a detective who would have seen him buying gasoline in cans.

At this point we should all be praying for the family members of the little boys, and all the rest who have emotional ties to any of them.

NedGrimley
Brigham City, UT

While I in no way justify the man nor his actions, its sure easy for sightseers to pass judgment after the fact about what shoulda, woulda, coulda been done.

snowman
Provo, UT

Josh should never have had those kids at his home.

slgs5aggie
Cedar City, UT

Very well written article. The fact is, there was no legal reason for the kids to not have a supervised visit. He had not been arrested, had no legal charges and has the right to be presumed innocent, even if all of us think he is guilty. I believe that protective services should have been involved in the very beginning. Questioning the safety of a parent taking two very young toddlers camping in the middle of winter, during a very harsh winter, without proper equipment and without being properly prepared. That was a showing a direct disregard towards the children's well being. Putting them in danger.

three11stu
Saratoga Springs, UT

Because we live in the United States, we all have freedoms. The same rights that give us freedom of religion, freedom to choose where to work, the right to bear arms, and the right to vote, gave Josh Powell the right to have the children in his home. He was not guilty of murder. Nothing had been proven. Just because his behavior is suspicious does not exclude him from any rights he has living in this country.
We have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. As one of the police officers said yesterday, you have "one shot to get this guy". You cannot make a case with little evidence and hope that more comes up later that will help you convict him.
There was nothing that could have been done to prevent this. Had the visits been done in an office, he would have killed the children there instead. He was going to act the way that he did regardless of anything that anybody else did.

Kathy.
Iowa, Iowa

Can we please have Susan's law, to protect children from someone suspected of killing their mother?

I believe the jury is in on whether or not he killed Susan.

three11stu
Saratoga Springs, UT

@Kathy: The children were protected from their father. They were removed from his care, and he only had SUPERVISED visitation with them for 6 hours a week.
NOTHING would have stopped Josh Powell from killing his children.

Trooper55
Williams, AZ

I believe that hind sight here in this case was that more percaution should have been taken on this case, since he judge had ordered an physcosexual exiame and a polgragh test. I know this man was just someone of interest in the case of his missing wife, but I believe that he was involued in his wife's dissaperance and also her death. A sane man wouldn't of taken the life of his children if he loved them like he claimed. I also believe he took the cowards way out, because he knew he may be charged in his wife's death. I believe that the ppolice from West Valley had some leads and maybe more to charge him.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments