Quantcast

Comments about ‘Rep. Jim Matheson jumps to 4th Congressional District for re-election’

Return to article »

Published: Thursday, Dec. 15 2011 5:35 p.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Liberal Ted
Salt Lake City, UT

matheson is just another money grabbing politician. he is allowed to do insider trading, waits to vote until he finds out how he should vote (meaning if the democrats need his vote then he's there; if democrats can win without his vote then he'll vote against them to keep the more conservative base happy). In the end he brags at how much more money he makes than Senator Lee....how is this possible if he's serving the people?

Time to get that non-sense matheson out! and his messiah barack

reader1234
South Jordan, UT

Yes, he will never win my district. I don't know of a single democrat in my neighborhood.

williary
Kearns, UT

As a Democrat, could honestly care less whether Matheson keeps his job or not. Would certainly prefer him to the ultra-conservative ridiculouness of Carl Wimmer, but in the end, it matters not. As was mentioned above, he's able to keep his job in the great blindly Red state of Utah by being allowed not to vote when his vote is not needed. I actually have very little idea what he actually stands for. Rarely takes a stance that could hurt his standing with the Conservative Democrats in Utah.

Carl Wimmer, Mike Lee, Jason Chaffetz, Gary Herbert.....

Utah politics continue to become a laughing stock of American politics. And continue to become less and less relevent, or able to fight for real issues. Nobody takes these clowns seriously.

ljeppson
Salt Lake City, UT

I'm glad to see him hanging in there. We need at least one Democrat in DC.

James FFS
Bountiful, UT

It was smart for Matheson to jump to the 4th district. There is no way he could have beat Chris Stewart in the 2nd district.

On the other hand
Spanish Fork, UT

Better Matheson than Wimmer or Sandstrom. Still, I think he would have made a great governor.

John Harrison
Sandy, UT

This is an interesting move by Matheson. He's a reasonable guy and has represented his district well.

Redistricting was aimed at harming Salt Lake County and removing its influence as much as possible by dilution. The Sutherland Institute has a great piece explaining the conservative rationale for the marginalization or urban voters.

Given that the announced GOP candidates in the 4th district are very far right a moderate like Matheson has a chance there. I wonder if he'll move, or if he'll just pull a Chaffetz and live outside his district.

Liberal Ted
Salt Lake City, UT

Utah's unemployment has dropped, by job creation. For the country employment dropped because people gave up looking, discouraged, or lost jobs.

Ha Ha Ha Ha....

Not sure why Utah would be the laughing stock of the country. People and businesses keep moving here. Would that make sense if we were the laughing stock?

Maybe instead of being negative and narrow minded and blinded by your party and barack. Maybe you could sit back and learn something from Utah's economy. Which are lower taxes, business friendly environment, educated work force, non-union workers, lower crime, 4-seasons etc. Meanwhile California and other states, believe they are going to increase jobs by taxing the people to death and tax and regulate any business that moves and re-distributing peoples money that work to those who won't work. That may buy them votes, but, they're losing population and congressional seats.

Matheson makes sense only in the sense that he's worried about his job. He represents anything that gives him insider trading information. He mocked Senator Lee for not making as much money as he has being in public office. That should tell you something right there.

BaldHobbit
Bountiful, UT

First of all, if it is in a different district, then I don't really consider it a "re-" election. Secondly, Matheson's comment is just as predictably political as are the drawing of the district boundaries. Deplorable? Maybe. Expected? Definitely. And I am not saying this is all bad, either. Sometimes if the fight is worth fighting, you've got to say some nasty things . . . just sayin' . . .

lost in DC
West Jordan, UT

I can now vote against him, I could not before.

a vote for Matheson is a vote for "we have to pass the bill so we can see what's in it" pelosi as speaker

stevo123
slc, ut

Jim has done a good job, he would not have been back there for ten years if he had not. He will likely run against one of two guys trying to fall off the earth being the most right wing. Should be a fun one to watch.

Cats
Somewhere in Time, UT

I hope he is finished now.

Utah Observer
West Jordan, Utah

At last Matheson comes back to southwest Salt Lake County. He first won election in 2000 and was a moderate voice then as he continues to be now. All the naysayers about him in Utah who thought they can pin a strong democratic label on him have been wrong. He keeps winning in this GOP dominated state because he has proven to be independent and for the people, not partisan politics. This forumula has proven him well in the past. It will be interesting to see how this plays out in this new district. You had to expect the anti-Matheson crowd to starting crowing loudly against him no matter where he ran.

deserthound
Salt Lake City, UT

Even if I was Winnie the Pooh and running in this race, my response to Carl Wimmer would be "Bring it on!" Jim Matheson may be a bit slippery with his positions at times but Wimmer? Om my gosh, this nutball wouldn't recognize a fact if it bit him in the behind.

justcap
Provo, UT

I'm a Republican, but here's my opinion:

Matheson > Sandstrom > Wimmer

Love/Cobb > Sandstrom > Wimmer

But since I don't know anything about Love/Cobb, then

Love/Cobb ? Matheson

TRUTH
Salt Lake City, UT

@Justcap.....I'm a Republican?....

You maybe a RINO, but if you prefer Matheson over any GOPers you are not a conservative......

peter
Alpine, UT

It's time to cleanse Washington of incumbents. Politicians are like socks, they begin to stink if you don't change them regularly. We don't need experience back there if we have principled people who follow common sense constitutional guidelines.

The Rock
Federal Way, WA

The fundamental problem with party politics is the fact that elected officials are supposed to represent the people that voted for them but as soon as they get elected they forget all the people back home and just represent their political party.

There would be almost zero politics if the government simply followed the constitution. Almost everything we fight over is unconstitutional.

Jefferson said that if he were to make one change it in the constitution it would be to deny Congress the power to borrow money. Do that and there would be no deficits and nothing to fund all this unconstitutional social spending.

How can congressmen swear to uphold a constitution they either never read or have not read since the 8th grade?

Virgil
SALT LAKE CITY, UT

Could it possibly be because Mattheson isn't liberal enough to survive the new 2nd District Democratic Primary? He only won the primary last time because moderate rural democrats showed up to support him, something the he will be lacking in the new 2nd.

ExecutorIoh
West Jordan, UT

Not a smart move. The SW corner of the Salt Lake Valley and west side of Utah County is 80% Conservative Republican. Matheson should have stayed in District 2. In District 4, he will get slaughtered.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments