Comments about ‘Beyond Ordinary: Lessons learned from the life of an apostle’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Faith
- Letters to family show Steven Powell still...
- 'Tattooed Mormon' Al Fox shares her...
- Live streaming: Frances J. Monson funeral
- USA Today takes note of LDS sister missionaries
- Defending the Faith: A case for the...
- Tornado relief spurs LDS Church, Layton's...
- Public invited to funeral services for Sister...
- 'Hollywood goes to Mormon country': BYU...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Faith
- 'Tattooed Mormon' Al Fox shares her...
38 - Defending the Faith: A case for the...
26 - Muslim leaders in U.S. facing...
25 - 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah...
23 - Wright Words: Oklahoma tornado provides...
23 - Secretary of State John Kerry says...
22 - Supreme Court to weigh in on...
17 - Hundreds of teens in Southern...
12



Keith, you continue to inspire. I just need you to do inspire us more. I suspect I speak for many who want to hear more from Special K.
I have not read the words of Elder Oaks regarding "assigning reasons" to revelations. So, it is possible I don't understand the issue fully.
However, to me, there is a difference in "assigning reasons" versus "exploring ideas" so to speak. D&C 97:14 says: "That they may be perfected in the understanding of their ministry, in theory, in principle, and in doctrine, in all things pertaining to the kingdom of God on the earth..."
Notice the words "in theory", which to me gives us "permission", so to speak, to wonder and explore about these things without getting too specific or "assigning reasons". If somebody says "the blacks were denied the Priesthood because of ..." vs somebody who says "the blacks were denied the Priesthood might have something to do with...". The second statement explores "in theory" and the first assigns a reason.
No we shouldn't assign reason, but I don't think it means we should "cut off" understanding, if it can be obtained. I see the difference clearly, and I hope I make my point clear.
I didn't know Shaquille O'neal knew how to write.
I remember Keith from our days in the San Francisco Stake. I don't expect him to remember me, but I appreciate this as I do Marcus Martins article from BYU Studies of a few years ago. Thank you, Keith
Great article. I bought Elder Oaks book and will read it soon. Your book, Keith, is also a great read. Inspiring, interesting, and valuable doctrinal insights. Keep writing.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments