Comments about ‘Animal cruelty investigation leads police to drugs, guns’

Your report about the "stash of guns" seems to be misleading. A rifle and a handgun would not represent a "stash". The fact that he was a convicted felon in possession of any weapons or any amount of controlled substances should have been the emphasis of the story, . . . along with the animal poisoning charge, of course.

When will the media realize that individuals who legally own guns and abide the laws concerning their safe and proper use, are not criminals? Please refrain from sensationalistic and inaccurate reporting. Additionally, your report has no explanation why he felt that there was a need to poison the dog. Was he just being sadistic? Or, was he trying to protect his home from an unleashed, unsupervised or threatening dog? Where is the rest of this story?