Comments about ‘New study shows income level not a factor in child autism, but parental age and ethnicity might’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- Growing pains: Rate of young men struggling...
- Charges: Runaway teen caused accident that...
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
33 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
25 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
14 - Poll shows Utahns think Legislature's...
14 - Man shot brother while showing him...
13 - Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches
12






A person with autism has a social and communication issue. Not necessarily an intelligence issue. Why did this study pair the two groups? A link to the actual study would be nice.
I don't think it has anything to do with income, but could also relate to environmental factors - such as the quality of food, the chemical exposures, and other environmental things, besides a mother's age.
It used to be that a mother who bore a child into her 40's would have a higher likelihood of having a down's syndrome baby. Maybe the greater the age, the more changes occur with developmental factors.
Except that 80% of babies born with Down Syndrome are born to women under the age of 35. 20% are born to women over 35. Only since so few women over 35 have babies the incident is higher and you get testing available. You are more likely to be born with Down Syndrome if your mother is under 35 rather than over 35.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments