Comments about ‘Whose presidential campaign logo is best?’

Romney's is as good as Obama did, so it's a success. I remember looking at McCain thinking 'are you nuts? You're website is archaic, and you're image, well... no, just stop now'

McCain had one of the worst campaigns I could imagine.

Huntsman's looks more like a car dealership logo than a campaign logo!

I try not to look at their logo's...

I look at their records.

I thought Cain's logo was the best.

Pagan, I can't help but look at them... they're everywhere! lol - but they don't factor in my decision... I like graphic design (a little) and that is my only interest here.

I'm not saying your point was meant towards me, just that there are other reasons to look at a logo.

'Pagan, I can't help but look at them...' - A voice of Reason | 12:24 p.m. July 22, 2011

Very good. That's understandable. I, in no way, meant to imply that my post was in relation to your own. I would have quoted you in an attempt to respond at that point.

Logo's and tag lines are fine. 'Drill baby drill, Yes we can, etc.' They sum up a person's stance quickly.

I only mean to encourage others to do their homework, and find out as much as possible before choosing who to vote for.

"I only mean to encourage others to do their homework, and find out as much as possible before choosing who to vote for."

Well said!

Romney's logo looks like a flag blowing "freely" in the breeze if you turn it sideways. I thought that it was intended to be portrayed this way because he often stresses that we need to safeguard our freedom. It just made some sense to me.

Since the article was about the logos I thought I'd look at all of them. Honestly, I didn't like Romney's or Huntsman's at all. Bachman and the one after it I thought looked the best. The others were good. Newt's was pretty good too.

Huntsman's did look like a car dealer and Romney's just looked strange.

Politically I haven't even looked at the candidates so these is simply based on the logos themselves.